Criteria Specification (CSpec) Registry is intended to provide access to the Criteria Specifications used and applied by ClinGen Variant Curation Expert Panels and biocurators in the classification of variants.
For general information about the ClinGen Expert Panels and Variant Curation please visit: Clinical Domain Working Groups. For specific inquiries regarding content correction or adding a new criteria specification refer to the Help page.
Should you encounter any issues regarding the data displayed, lack of functionality or other problems, please let us know by contacting us via email.
formatting edit only
| Criteria & Strength Specifications | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PVS1 | ||||
|  Original ACMG Summary Null variant (nonsense, frameshift, canonical +/−1 or 2 splice sites, initiation codon, single or multi-exon deletion) in a gene where loss of function (LOF) is a known mechanism of disease. Caveats: • Beware of genes where LOF is not a known disease mechanism (e.g. GFAP, MYH7). • Use caution interpreting LOF variants at the extreme 3’ end of a gene. • Use caution with splice variants that are predicted to lead to exon skipping but leave the remainder of the protein intact. • Use caution in the presence of multiple transcripts. 
              VCEP Specifications:
               Biologically relevant transcript: NM_001204.7. LOF variants 5' or at c.2816 (exons 1-12) are expected to undergo NMD. Variants 3' to c.2816 (exon 13) are not expected to undergo NMD. Exon 13 does not contain regions critical for protein function and encodes <10% of the protein. Variant p.Trp13X (W13X) is known to escape NMD and produce a truncated protein (PMID: 20095988). Critical regions for protein function: ligand binding domain (aa 33-131), kinase domain (aa 203-504), heterodimerization domain (aa 485-492), and transmembrane domain (aa 151-171). For canonical splice variants, RNA splicing assay data is not necessary for applying PVS1; follow the decision tree based on the predicted effect of disrupted. splicing. Note that exons 1, 2, 3, 4, 6 are in-frame and a loss of a canonical splice acceptor/donor is not expected to result in NMD. Non-canonical splice site variants with RNA splicing assay data may be applicable for PVS1 according to the decision tree. The initiation codon is located in exon 1. There are approximately 27 in-frame downstream AUG initiation codons including 5 sites located in ex 4-6 having translation initiation scores similar or greater than the exon 1 codon (PMID: 20095988). However, there are many P/LP variants upstream of exons 4-6.  Stand Alone  Very Strong Null variant (nonsense, frameshift, canonical +/−1 or 2 splice sites, initiation codon, single or multi-exon deletion) in a gene where loss of function (LOF) is a known mechanism of disease. Caveats: 
 **Use the PVS1 decision tree guide. 
                Modification Type: 
                Gene-specific
                Strong Use the PVS1 decision tree guide. 
                Modification Type: 
                Gene-specific,Strength
                Moderate Use the PVS1 decision tree guide. 
                Modification Type: 
                Gene-specific,Strength
                Supporting  Not Applicable | ||||
| PS1 | ||||
|  Original ACMG Summary Same amino acid change as a previously established pathogenic variant regardless of nucleotide change. Example: Val->Leu caused by either G>C or G>T in the same codon. Caveat: Beware of changes that impact splicing rather than at the amino acid/protein level.  Stand Alone  Very Strong  Strong Same amino acid change as a previously established pathogenic variant regardless of nucleotide change. Example: Val->Leu caused by either G>C or G>T in the same codon. Caveat: Beware of changes that impact splicing rather than at the amino acid/protein level. 
                Modification Type: 
                None
                Moderate Same amino acid change as a previously established likely pathogenic variant regardless of nucleotide change. 
                Modification Type: 
                Strength
                Supporting  Not Applicable | ||||
| PS2 | ||||
|  Original ACMG Summary De novo (both maternity and paternity confirmed) in a patient with the disease and no family history. Note: Confirmation of paternity only is insufficient. Egg donation, surrogate motherhood, errors in embryo transfer, etc. can contribute to non-maternity.  Stand Alone  Very Strong  Strong De novo (both maternity and paternity confirmed) in a patient with the disease and no family history. Note: Confirmation of paternity only is insufficient. Egg donation, surrogate motherhood, errors in embryo transfer, etc. can contribute to non-maternity. 
                Modification Type: 
                No change
                Moderate  Supporting  Not Applicable | ||||
| PS3 | ||||
|  Original ACMG Summary Well-established in vitro or in vivo functional studies supportive of a damaging effect on the gene or gene product. Note: Functional studies that have been validated and shown to be reproducible and robust in a clinical diagnostic laboratory setting are considered the most well-established. 
              VCEP Specifications:
               Can be applied additively with PP3 if applicable.  Stand Alone  Very Strong  Strong Use the BMPR2 functional assay document for guidance on allowable assays. Known variant validation controls (i.e. established pathogenic and benign variants) are required. One exception is if the same functional assay has been performed for the same variant by two independent groups and demonstrated to have the same functional effect by both groups. Also applicable for non-canonical splice site variants when RNA splice site assay data is available demonstrating abnormal splicing; positive and negative controls are required, preferably from patients and matched unaffected individuals. Note that splicing assay results may be tissue-sensitive. 
                Modification Type: 
                General recommendation,Gene-specific
                Moderate  Supporting Use the BMPR2 functional assay document for guidance on allowable assays. If no known variant validation controls (i.e. established pathogenic and benign variants) were used, then score at the supporting strength. 
                Modification Type: 
                General recommendation
                Not Applicable | ||||
| PS4 | ||||
|  Original ACMG Summary The prevalence of the variant in affected individuals is significantly increased compared to the prevalence in controls. Note 1: Relative risk (RR) or odds ratio (OR), as obtained from case-control studies, is >5.0 and the confidence interval around the estimate of RR or OR does not include 1.0. See manuscript for detailed guidance. Note 2: In instances of very rare variants where case-control studies may not reach statistical significance, the prior observation of the variant in multiple unrelated patients with the same phenotype, and its absence in controls, may be used as moderate level of evidence. 
              VCEP Specifications:
               Affected individuals are defined as having a mean pulmonary artery pressure (mPAP) >20 mm Hg by right heart catheterization (RHC), or estimated by echocardiography if RHC is not advised. Strength is based on the number of unrelated PAH (heritable and/or idiopathic) probands identified with a variant. Unpublished, VCEP-approved internal case/variant data is acceptable if the proband does not have another pathogenic or likely pathogenic BMPR2 variant. Justification for the proband thresholds is provided in the “Data and citations related to PS4” attachment. PS4 (at any strength) and PM2_supporting can be used additively.  Stand Alone  Very Strong  Strong Prior observation of the variant in >4 unrelated patients with the same phenotype, and its absence in controls. 
                Modification Type: 
                Disease-specific
                Moderate Prior observation of the variant in >3 unrelated patients with the same phenotype, and its absence in controls. 
                Modification Type: 
                Disease-specific,Strength
                Supporting Prior observation of the variant in >1 unrelated patients with the same phenotype, and its absence in controls. 
                Modification Type: 
                Disease-specific,Strength
                Not Applicable | ||||
| PM1 | ||||
|  Original ACMG Summary Located in a mutational hot spot and/or critical and well-established functional domain (e.g. active site of an enzyme) without benign variation. 
              VCEP Specifications:
               Well-established functional domains for BMPR2 include the extracellular (ligand-binding) domain, protein kinase domain, and heterodimerization motif within the kinase domain. Strong evidence based on evolutionary conservation, in vitro functional assays, and protein structural analyses indicates the critical (or non-critical) nature of specific amino acid residues within each of these domains (see attached “Data and citations related to PM1”). Strength should be applied accordingly.  Stand Alone  Very Strong  Strong Variant changes a critical amino acid. Extracellular domain: p.Cys34, Cys60, Cys66, Cys84, Cys94, Cys99, Cys116, Cys117, Cys118, Cys123. Kinase domain: p.Gly210, Gly212, Lys230, Glu/Asn245, Asp333, Asn338, Asp351, Gly353 Glu386, Asp405, Gly410, Arg491. KD heterodimerization: p.Asp485, Gln486, Asp487, Ala488, Arg489, Ala490, Arg491, Leu492. Note that p.Gln42Arg, Gly47Gln, Gln82His, Thr102Ala, Ser107Pro, Gly182Asp, Met186Val, Glu503Asp, Arg899X, and Arg899Pro have been demonstrated non-critical/not necessary for kinase activity based on a luciferase assay (apply BS3). 
                Modification Type: 
                Gene-specific,Strength
                Moderate Variant changes an amino acid in the extracellular domain (aa 33-131) or kinase domain (aa 203-504) but without functional evidence indicating critical or non-critical. Note that p.Cys34, Cys60, Cys66, Cys84, Cys94, Cys99, Cys116, Cys117, Cys118, Cys123, Gly210, Gly212, Lys230, Glu/Asn245, Asp333, Asn338, Asp351, Gly353 Glu386, Asp405, Gly410, Asp485, Gln486, Asp487, Ala488, Arg489, Ala490, Arg491, Arg491, and Leu492 have been demonstrated critical (apply PM1_strong). Note that p.Gln42Arg, Gly47Gln, Gln82His, Thr102Ala, Ser107Pro, Gly182Asp, Met186Val, Glu503Asp, Arg899X, and Arg899Pro have been demonstrated non-critical/not necessary for kinase activity based on a luciferase assay (apply BS3). 
                Modification Type: 
                Gene-specific
                Supporting  Not Applicable | ||||
| PM2 | ||||
|  Original ACMG Summary Absent from controls (or at extremely low frequency if recessive) in Exome Sequencing Project, 1000 Genomes or Exome Aggregation Consortium. Caveat: Population data for indels may be poorly called by next generation sequencing. 
              VCEP Specifications:
               PAH has a prevalence of 15-50 cases/million individuals and the population allele frequency threshold for PM2 is based on this frequency. There is no evidence for a genetic ancestry effect on PAH prevalence, so the use of any sub-population data is acceptable (as long as there is a minimum allele count of 1,000). As specified by the SVI WG, PM2 is scored at the supporting level only. Note that PM2_supporting and PS4 (at any strength) can be used additively.  Stand Alone  Very Strong  Strong  Moderate  Supporting Present at <0.01% among gnomAD controls, using the subpopulation with the highest frequency and at least 1,000 allele counts. Caveat: Population data for indels may be poorly called by next generation sequencing. 
                Modification Type: 
                Disease-specific
                Not Applicable | ||||
| PM3 | ||||
|  Original ACMG Summary For recessive disorders, detected in trans with a pathogenic variant Note: This requires testing of parents (or offspring) to determine phase.  Stand Alone  Very Strong  Strong  Moderate  Supporting  Not ApplicableComments:
              PAH is autosomal dominant. | ||||
| PM4 | ||||
|  Original ACMG Summary Protein length changes due to in-frame deletions/insertions in a non-repeat region or stop-loss variants.  Stand Alone  Very Strong  Strong  Moderate Protein length changes due to in-frame deletions/insertions in a non-repeat region or stop-loss variants. 
                Modification Type: 
                No change
                Supporting  Not Applicable | ||||
| PM5 | ||||
|  Original ACMG Summary Novel missense change at an amino acid residue where a different missense change determined to be pathogenic has been seen before. Example: Arg156His is pathogenic; now you observe Arg156Cys. Caveat: Beware of changes that impact splicing rather than at the amino acid/protein level.  Stand Alone  Very Strong  Strong  Moderate Novel missense change at an amino acid residue where a different missense change determined to be pathogenic has been seen before. Example: Arg156His is pathogenic; now you observe Arg156Cys. Caveat: Beware of changes that impact splicing rather than at the amino acid/protein level. Also applicable for variants affecting the same splice site as a confirmed splice variant with similar or worse splicing in silico predictions 
                Modification Type: 
                General recommendation
                Supporting Novel missense change at an amino acid residue where a different missense change determined to be likely pathogenic has been seen before. 
                Modification Type: 
                Strength
                Not Applicable | ||||
| PM6 | ||||
|  Original ACMG Summary Assumed de novo, but without confirmation of paternity and maternity.  Stand Alone  Very Strong  Strong  Moderate Assumed de novo, but without confirmation of paternity and maternity. 
                Modification Type: 
                No change
                Supporting  Not Applicable | ||||
| PP1 | ||||
|  Original ACMG Summary Co-segregation with disease in multiple affected family members in a gene definitively known to cause the disease. Note: May be used as stronger evidence with increasing segregation data. 
              VCEP Specifications:
               Note: PAH exhibits variable age of onset and incomplete penetrance. Three levels of evidence are applied based on autosomal dominant likelihood ratios of 10 (3 meioses, LOD 0.9, supporting), 30 (5 meioses, LOD 1.5, moderate), and 100 (7 meioses, LOD 2.1, strong) provided that PM2 (absent or rare in large population cohorts) is met. Demonstration of segregation in more than one family is not necessary as BMPR2 is a well-established PAH gene. PMID: 29300372.  Stand Alone  Very Strong  Strong Co-segregation with disease in ≥7 affected family members. 
                Modification Type: 
                Strength
                Moderate Co-segregation with disease in ≥5 affected family members. 
                Modification Type: 
                Strength
                Supporting Co-segregation with disease in ≥3 affected family members. 
                Modification Type: 
                Strength
                Not Applicable | ||||
| PP2 | ||||
|  Original ACMG Summary Missense variant in a gene that has a low rate of benign missense variation and where missense variants are a common mechanism of disease.  Stand Alone  Very Strong  Strong  Moderate  Supporting  Not ApplicableComments:
              BMPR2 is not constrained for missense variants. | ||||
| PP3 | ||||
|  Original ACMG Summary Multiple lines of computational evidence support a deleterious effect on the gene or gene product (conservation, evolutionary, splicing impact, etc.). Caveat: As many in silico algorithms use the same or very similar input for their predictions, each algorithm should not be counted as an independent criterion. PP3 can be used only once in any evaluation of a variant.  Stand Alone  Very Strong  Strong  Moderate  Supporting REVEL ≥0.75 for missense variants or Splice AI ≥0.2 for non-canonical splice variants. No up/downgrading. If no REVEL score or SpliceAI prediction is available, then CADD ≥20 can be used. Note: can be applied additively with PS3 if applicable. 
                Modification Type: 
                General recommendation
                Not Applicable | ||||
| PP4 | ||||
|  Original ACMG Summary Patient’s phenotype or family history is highly specific for a disease with a single genetic etiology.  Stand Alone  Very Strong  Strong  Moderate  Supporting  Not ApplicableComments:
              PAH does not have a single genetic etiology. | ||||
| PP5 | ||||
|  Original ACMG Summary Reputable source recently reports variant as pathogenic, but the evidence is not available to the laboratory to perform an independent evaluation.  Not Applicable  This criterion is not for use as recommended by the ClinGen Sequence Variant Interpretation VCEP Review Committee.
              
               PubMed : 29543229 
              
             | ||||
| BA1 | ||||
|  Original ACMG Summary Allele frequency is above 5% in Exome Sequencing Project, 1000 Genomes or Exome Aggregation Consortium.  Stand Alone Allele frequency is above 1% in gnomAD, including any sub-population with at least 1,000 allele counts. 
                Modification Type: 
                Disease-specific
                Very Strong  Strong  Moderate  Supporting  Not Applicable | ||||
| BS1 | ||||
|  Original ACMG Summary Allele frequency is greater than expected for disorder.  Stand Alone  Very Strong  Strong Allele frequency >=0.1% among gnomAD controls, using the subpopulation with the highest frequency and at least 1,000 allele counts. 
                Modification Type: 
                Disease-specific
                Moderate  Supporting  Not Applicable | ||||
| BS2 | ||||
|  Original ACMG Summary Observed in a healthy adult individual for a recessive (homozygous), dominant (heterozygous), or X-linked (hemizygous) disorder, with full penetrance expected at an early age. 
              VCEP Specifications:
               Strength based on number of homozygotes observed among gnomAD controls. Criteria not applicable for heterozygotes as BMPR2 variants exhibit incomplete penetrance.  Stand Alone  Very Strong  Strong Observed in ≥3 homozygotes in gnomAD controls or reported in the literature (healthy adult individuals). 
                Modification Type: 
                Disease-specific,Gene-specific
                Moderate  Supporting Observed in ≥2 homozygotes in gnomAD controls or reported in the literature (healthy adult individuals). 
                Modification Type: 
                Disease-specific,Gene-specific
                Not Applicable | ||||
| BS3 | ||||
|  Original ACMG Summary Well-established in vitro or in vivo functional studies show no damaging effect on protein function or splicing.  Stand Alone  Very Strong  Strong Use the BMPR2 functional assay document for acceptable assays and guidance. Note that p.Gln42Arg, Gly47Gln, Gln82His, Thr102Ala, Ser107Pro, Gly182Asp, Met186Val, Glu503Asp, Arg899X, and Arg899Pro have been demonstrated non-critical/not necessary for kinase activity based on a luciferase assay (apply BS3). Note that p.Cys34, Cys60, Cys66, Cys84, Cys94, Cys99, Cys116, Cys117, Cys118, Cys123, Gly210, Gly212, Lys230, Glu/Asn245, Asp333, Asn338, Asp351, Gly353 Glu386, Asp405, Gly410, Asp485, Gln486, Asp487, Ala488, Arg489, Ala490, Arg491, Arg491, and Leu492 have been demonstrated critical (apply PM1_strong). 
                Modification Type: 
                Gene-specific
                Moderate  Supporting  Not Applicable | ||||
| BS4 | ||||
|  Original ACMG Summary Lack of segregation in affected members of a family. Caveat: The presence of phenocopies for common phenotypes (i.e. cancer, epilepsy) can mimic lack of segregation among affected individuals. Also, families may have more than one pathogenic variant contributing to an autosomal dominant disorder, further confounding an apparent lack of segregation. 
              VCEP Specifications:
               Lack of disease segregation among BMPR2 variant carriers should not be scored due to low penetrance of PAH variants in families. Lack of variant segregation in affected family members should be scored.  Stand Alone  Very Strong  Strong Lack of variant segregation in affected members of a family. 
                Modification Type: 
                No change
                Moderate  Supporting  Not Applicable | ||||
| BP1 | ||||
|  Original ACMG Summary Missense variant in a gene for which primarily truncating variants are known to cause disease.  Stand Alone  Very Strong  Strong  Moderate  Supporting  Not ApplicableComments:
              Both LOF and missense variants are known to cause PAH. | ||||
| BP2 | ||||
|  Original ACMG Summary Observed in trans with a pathogenic variant for a fully penetrant dominant gene/disorder or observed in cis with a pathogenic variant in any inheritance pattern.  Stand Alone  Very Strong  Strong  Moderate  Supporting  Not ApplicableComments:
              BMPR2 variants are not fully penetrant. | ||||
| BP3 | ||||
|  Original ACMG Summary In frame-deletions/insertions in a repetitive region without a known function.  Stand Alone  Very Strong  Strong  Moderate  Supporting In frame-deletions/insertions in a repetitive region without a known function. 
                Modification Type: 
                No change
                Not Applicable | ||||
| BP4 | ||||
|  Original ACMG Summary Multiple lines of computational evidence suggest no impact on gene or gene product (conservation, evolutionary, splicing impact, etc) Caveat: As many in silico algorithms use the same or very similar input for their predictions, each algorithm cannot be counted as an independent criterion. BP4 can be used only once in any evaluation of a variant.  Stand Alone  Very Strong  Strong  Moderate  Supporting REVEL ≤0.25 for missense variants or Splice AI ≤0.1 for non-canonical splice variants. No up/downgrading. If no REVEL or. Splice AI available, then CADD ≤ 10 can be used. 
                Modification Type: 
                General recommendation
                Not Applicable | ||||
| BP5 | ||||
|  Original ACMG Summary Variant found in a case with an alternate molecular basis for disease.  Stand Alone  Very Strong  Strong  Moderate  Supporting  Not ApplicableComments:
              BMPR2 is the major causal PAH gene. | ||||
| BP6 | ||||
|  Original ACMG Summary Reputable source recently reports variant as benign, but the evidence is not available to the laboratory to perform an independent evaluation.  Not Applicable  This criterion is not for use as recommended by the ClinGen Sequence Variant Interpretation VCEP Review Committee.
              
               PubMed : 29543229 
              
             | ||||
| BP7 | ||||
|  Original ACMG Summary A synonymous variant for which splicing prediction algorithms predict no impact to the splice consensus sequence nor the creation of a new splice site AND the nucleotide is not highly conserved. 
              VCEP Specifications:
               Use default Splice AI predictions.  Stand Alone  Very Strong  Strong If BP7 is met and negative RNA splicing assay data is available, then apply BP7_strong. Acceptable splicing assays should have positive and negative controls, preferably from patients and matched unaffected individuals. Note that splicing assay results may be tissue-sensitive. 
                Modification Type: 
                Strength
                Moderate  Supporting A synonymous variant for which splicing prediction algorithms predict no impact to the splice consensus sequence nor the creation of a new splice site AND the nucleotide is not highly conserved. Applicable after assignment of BP4 for no adverse splicing predictions, and inclusive of exonic and intronic variants. Not applicable for synonymous variants located at the first base or the last three bases of an exon. 
                Modification Type: 
                No change
                Not Applicable | ||||
One Baylor Plaza, MS:BCM225 Suite 400D, Houston, TX, 77030
Questions or comments?