Criteria Specification Registry

Criteria Specification (CSpec) Registry is intended to provide access to the Criteria Specifications used and applied by ClinGen Variant Curation Expert Panels and biocurators in the classification of variants.

For general information about the ClinGen Expert Panels and Variant Curation please visit: Clinical Domain Working Groups. For specific inquiries regarding content correction or adding a new criteria specification refer to the Help page.

Should you encounter any issues regarding the data displayed, lack of functionality or other problems, please let us know by contacting us via email.

Criteria Specification

ClinGen Hereditary Breast, Ovarian and Pancreatic Cancer Expert Panel Specifications to the ACMG/AMP Variant Interpretation Guidelines for PALB2 Version 1.1.0

Description : Summary of ACMG-AMP Criteria for PALB2 associated with hereditary breast and pancreatic cancer

Version : 1.1.0 Release Notes :

Version 1.1 updates
Updated PS1 table to match Splicing SVI recommendations (PMID: 37352859)
Corrected errors in verbiage/typos for BP4
Changed BP4 from not applicable to applicable to make application of BP4 for splicing more visible in CSPEC
Verbiage update: RNA: At least one well-established in silico predictor (e.g. SpliceAI) shows no impact on splicing [updated from error in typing that said shows impact]
Verbiage update: *NOTE: BP4 splice predictions may not be used in conjunction with BP7_variable (RNA) [updated from just BP7 for clarification].
Added BP4 under the combinations for Benign and LB classification [this was omitted in error]

Hereditary Breast, Ovarian and Pancreatic Cancer VCEP

Released

11/28/2023

19:22:51

Rules for PALB2

Version 1.1 updates Updated PS1 table to match Splicing SVI recommendations (PMID: 37352859) Corrected errors in verbiage/typos for BP4 Changed BP4 from not applicable to applicable to make application of BP4 for splicing more visible in CSPEC Verbiage update: RNA: At least one well-established in silico predictor (e.g. SpliceAI) shows no impact on splicing [updated from error in typing that said shows impact] Verbiage update: *NOTE: BP4 splice predictions may not be used in conjunction with BP7_variable (RNA) [updated from just BP7 for clarification]. Added BP4 under the combinations for Benign and LB classification [this was omitted in error]

Gene: PALB2 (HGNC:26144) HGNC Name: partner and localizer of BRCA2 Transcripts: NM_024675.3 Disease: hereditary breast carcinoma (MONDO:0016419) Mode of Inheritance: Autosomal dominant inheritance familial pancreatic carcinoma (MONDO:0015278) Mode of Inheritance: Autosomal dominant inheritance Fanconi anemia complementation group N (MONDO:0012565) Mode of Inheritance: Autosomal recessive inheritance

Criteria & Strength Specifications
PVS1 PVS1 PS1 PS2 PS3 PS4 PM1 PM2 PM3 PM4 PM5 PM6 PP1 PP2 PP3 PP4 PP5 BA1 BS1 BS2 BS3 BS4 BP1 BP2 BP3 BP4 BP5 BP6 BP7 Files References
Original ACMG Summary Null variant (nonsense, frameshift, canonical +/−1 or 2 splice sites, initiation codon, single or multi-exon deletion) in a gene where loss of function (LOF) is a known mechanism of disease. Caveats: • Beware of genes where LOF is not a known disease mechanism (e.g. GFAP, MYH7). • Use caution interpreting LOF variants at the extreme 3’ end of a gene. • Use caution with splice variants that are predicted to lead to exon skipping but leave the remainder of the protein intact. • Use caution in the presence of multiple transcripts. Stand Alone Very Strong Use PALB2 PVS1 Decision Tree Modification Type: Gene-specific,Strength Strong Use PALB2 PVS1 Decision Tree. Modification Type: Gene-specific,Strength Moderate Use PALB2 PVS1 Decision Tree. Modification Type: Gene-specific,Strength Supporting Use PALB2 PVS1 Decision Tree Modification Type: Gene-specific,Strength Instructions: Use PALB2 PVS1 Decision Tree Per PALB2 Exon Map and PALB2 PVS1 Guide PVS1: Predicted splice defect PVS1_Strength(RNA): Observed splice defect The default RefSeq transcript for nucleotide (c.) annotation is NM_024675.3/ENST00000261584.8. Several naturally occurring alternate splicing isoforms have been described¹. Yet, after careful examination, none of them is considered a candidate rescue transcript (very low contribution to overall expression, not coding proteins predicted functional, or both). In keeping with that, we have considered that all presumed LoF events (PVS1 decision tree specifications) occur in biologically relevant transcript(s). WD40 beta propeller and the Coiled-coil domain (CC) are considered indispensable for PALB2 protein function. PVS1 alterations that are predicted to escape NMD, but that adversely affect the WD40 domain can be granted PVS1 (as opposed to PVS1_Strong as the recommended baseline². The following evidence supports this strength change: The WD40 domain interacts with many different protein partners that are involved in the double strand break repair pathway³ Two different C-terminal truncating mutations (c.3549C>A and c.3549C>G) resulting in loss of the last 3 amino acids [p.(Tyr1183Ter)], were identified in trans with PALB2 stop-gain variants in three unrelated FA (FA-N) patients⁴ The PALB2 WD40 toroidal structure is “sealed” in the seventh blade by interaction of the C-terminal strand with the incomplete N-terminal blade. The last four residues of PALB2 (Y1183, H1184, Y1185, and S1186) are directly involved in this interaction (molecular Velcro hydrogen bonding)⁰⁰. This is the rationale for the clinical relevance of the last 4 amino acids of the protein. Alterations predicted to lead to in frame losses adversely affecting the WD40 structure/function are found in trans with LoF PALB2 alterations in Fanconi Anemia patients⁴ Exon 10 donor: c.3113+5G>C (biallelic with c.395delT) Exon 12 donor: c.3350+4A>G (biallelic with c.2393_2394insCT) LoF alterations are rare in GnomAD in all exons GnomAD v2.1 accessed 5/30/2019 Total Variants (includes splice acceptor/donor-conservative) 1418 variants 336,349 carriers LoF Flag (excludes splice acceptor/donor-conservative) 95 variants (6.7%) 239 carriers (.07%) PVS1 can be applied as per the PVS1 decision tree. PVS1_Variable(RNA) shall be used for observed splice defects, whether from canonical +/-1,2 positions or other spliceogenic regions (including mid-exonic missense/synonymous variants that cause splice defects) with baseline weight as per the below decision tree. Weight can be further modified based on the quality of the RNA study including consideration of concepts such as: Starting material (where patient material is preferable to in vitro minigene) Use of NMD inhibitors where translation does occur such as cell lines⁵ ⁶ Primer design (to make sure it’s comprehensive to capture possible multicassette events) Method of quantification where e.g. capillary electrophoresis is preferable to estimation by gel band density where SNP analysis is most preferred (where analysis of exonic SNPs and their relative presence in aberrant and WT transcripts is informative) Quantification (where complete effects should have increased weight over incomplete effects) Specific guidance on the use of RNA evidence in variant assessment is not a gene-specific consideration for PALB2 at this time, therefore discretion is left to assessors until further guidance is provided for this general concept from the Sequence Variant Interpretation group. Not Applicable Comments: Used with PM5_Supporting for non-splice, non-start-loss LoF variants with PTCs upsteram of p.R3047. Per points system, PVS1 + 1 Supporting = LP.
PS1 PVS1 PS1 PS2 PS3 PS4 PM1 PM2 PM3 PM4 PM5 PM6 PP1 PP2 PP3 PP4 PP5 BA1 BS1 BS2 BS3 BS4 BP1 BP2 BP3 BP4 BP5 BP6 BP7 Files References
Original ACMG Summary Same amino acid change as a previously established pathogenic variant regardless of nucleotide change. Example: Val->Leu caused by either G>C or G>T in the same codon. Caveat: Beware of changes that impact splicing rather than at the amino acid/protein level. Stand Alone Very Strong Strong Use PALB2 PS1 Splicing table Modification Type: General recommendation Moderate Use PALB2 PS1 Splicing table Modification Type: General recommendation Supporting Use PALB2 PS1 Splicing table Modification Type: General recommendation Instructions: Protein: Do not use. Missense changes are not yet confirmed as a mechanism of disease for PALB2 Splicing: See PALB2 PS1 Table (PMID: 37352859) Not Applicable
PS2 PVS1 PS1 PS2 PS3 PS4 PM1 PM2 PM3 PM4 PM5 PM6 PP1 PP2 PP3 PP4 PP5 BA1 BS1 BS2 BS3 BS4 BP1 BP2 BP3 BP4 BP5 BP6 BP7 Files References
Original ACMG Summary De novo (both maternity and paternity confirmed) in a patient with the disease and no family history. Note: Confirmation of paternity only is insufficient. Egg donation, surrogate motherhood, errors in embryo transfer, etc. can contribute to non-maternity. Stand Alone Very Strong Strong Moderate Supporting Not Applicable Comments: ● Do not use for AD or AR disease: Informative de novo occurrences have not yet been observed and de novo AR conditions are unlikely to be informed by phase ● Autosomal Dominant Disease: Do not use-Informative de novo occurrences have not yet been observed for autosomal dominant disease. As breast cancer is relatively common and occurs frequently as an apparently sporadic event, de novo is unlikely to ever be informative unless specific features of PALB2-related cancer predisposition are identified. ● Autosomal Recessive Disease: Do not use - de novo occurrences are too rare to be informative at this time. In addition, in a biallelic state, de novo occurrences have an exceedingly low probability of being able to be confirmed as in trans because parental testing (and identification of one variant in each parent) is typically required without the use of long-range technologies.
PS3 PVS1 PS1 PS2 PS3 PS4 PM1 PM2 PM3 PM4 PM5 PM6 PP1 PP2 PP3 PP4 PP5 BA1 BS1 BS2 BS3 BS4 BP1 BP2 BP3 BP4 BP5 BP6 BP7 Files References
Original ACMG Summary Well-established in vitro or in vivo functional studies supportive of a damaging effect on the gene or gene product. Note: Functional studies that have been validated and shown to be reproducible and robust in a clinical diagnostic laboratory setting are considered the most well-established. Stand Alone Very Strong Strong Moderate Supporting Instructions: For protein, see detailed notes on ATM-specific assays; For RNA use code PVS1_O and modulate strength based on assay quality and quantity (curator discretion). Not Applicable Comments: ● Protein: Do not use: Lack of known positive controls ● RNA: Do not use: See code PVS1_Variable(RNA)
PS4 PVS1 PS1 PS2 PS3 PS4 PM1 PM2 PM3 PM4 PM5 PM6 PP1 PP2 PP3 PP4 PP5 BA1 BS1 BS2 BS3 BS4 BP1 BP2 BP3 BP4 BP5 BP6 BP7 Files References
Original ACMG Summary The prevalence of the variant in affected individuals is significantly increased compared to the prevalence in controls. Note 1: Relative risk (RR) or odds ratio (OR), as obtained from case-control studies, is >5.0 and the confidence interval around the estimate of RR or OR does not include 1.0. See manuscript for detailed guidance. Note 2: In instances of very rare variants where case-control studies may not reach statistical significance, the prior observation of the variant in multiple unrelated patients with the same phenotype, and its absence in controls, may be used as moderate level of evidence. Stand Alone Very Strong Strong Case-control studies; p-value ≤.05 AND (Odds ratio, hazard ratio, or relative risk ≥3 OR lower 95% CI ≥1.5). Modification Type: Disease-specific Moderate Supporting Instructions: PS4_Moderate: Do not use. Proband counting for genes causing a common disorder need to be calibrated in a population-specific way before use. Not Applicable
PM1 PVS1 PS1 PS2 PS3 PS4 PM1 PM2 PM3 PM4 PM5 PM6 PP1 PP2 PP3 PP4 PP5 BA1 BS1 BS2 BS3 BS4 BP1 BP2 BP3 BP4 BP5 BP6 BP7 Files References
Original ACMG Summary Located in a mutational hot spot and/or critical and well-established functional domain (e.g. active site of an enzyme) without benign variation. Stand Alone Very Strong Strong Moderate Supporting Not Applicable Comments: Do not use: Missense pathogenic variation in PALB2 is not yet confirmed as a mechanism of disease.
PM2 PVS1 PS1 PS2 PS3 PS4 PM1 PM2 PM3 PM4 PM5 PM6 PP1 PP2 PP3 PP4 PP5 BA1 BS1 BS2 BS3 BS4 BP1 BP2 BP3 BP4 BP5 BP6 BP7 Files References
Original ACMG Summary Absent from controls (or at extremely low frequency if recessive) in Exome Sequencing Project, 1000 Genomes or Exome Aggregation Consortium. Caveat: Population data for indels may be poorly called by next generation sequencing. Stand Alone Very Strong Strong Moderate Supporting Variant absent in gnomAD or present in ≤ 1/300,000 alleles Modification Type: Gene-specific,Strength Instructions: PM2_supporting is not considered a conflicting piece of evidence for variants that otherwise are likely benign/benign Use as PM2_Supporting (not moderate) Not Applicable Comments: PM2_Supporting is not considered a conflicting piece of evidence to an otherwise benign body of evidence; Coverage must be >30X at the locus.
PM3 PVS1 PS1 PS2 PS3 PS4 PM1 PM2 PM3 PM4 PM5 PM6 PP1 PP2 PP3 PP4 PP5 BA1 BS1 BS2 BS3 BS4 BP1 BP2 BP3 BP4 BP5 BP6 BP7 Files References
Original ACMG Summary For recessive disorders, detected in trans with a pathogenic variant Note: This requires testing of parents (or offspring) to determine phase. Stand Alone Very Strong Strong Use Fanconi Anemia PM3 tables Modification Type: Disease-specific,Strength Moderate Use Fanconi Anemia PM3 tables Modification Type: Disease-specific,Strength Supporting Use Fanconi Anemia PM3 tables Modification Type: Disease-specific,Strength Instructions: Fanconi Anemia (FA) of any subtype is generally considered an exceedingly rare, severe, early-onset disease with variable features. In the case of BRCA2, hypomorphic FA patients have been described who are diagnosed at older ages with less severe phenotypes. The criteria set forth in the tables below are designed to accommodate such hypomorphs and are recommended to be applied to all FA-associated genes which may not be as well described due to the extreme infrequency of their identification, and due to ascertainment bias (for severe phenotype) in the literature. Variant may not exceed general population frequency >0.01%. Consider other gene panel test results as potential explanation for phenotype. Multiple unrelated cases are additive. Ex. one individual homozygous for a variant with Fanconi gets 2.0 points. Another individual affected with Fanconi Anemia has the same variant and another truncating PALB2 variant with phase unknown gets 2.0 points. In total, there are 4.0 points towards PM3. Phenotype consistent: Chromosomal breakage with 1 clinical feature OR at least 2 of 3 clinical features from separate categories without chromosomal breakage studies Ex. Chromosomal breakage testing + microcephaly / triangular face Ex. (Without chromosomal breakage): Myelodysplastic Syndrome and microcephaly / triangular face. Individuals must have features from at least 2 of 3 distinct Cinical Feature categories below. Positive for chromosome breakage test: Increased chromosome breakage and/or radial forms on cytogenetic testing of lymphocytes with diepoxybutane (DEB) or mitomycin C (MMC) Clinical features indicative of FA, including Physical features (in ~75% of affected persons), include: prenatal and/or postnatal short stature abnormal skin pigmentation (e.g., café au lait macules, hypo- pigmentation) Skeletal malformations (e.g., hypoplastic thumb, hypoplastic radius) Microcephaly, triangular face Ophthalmic anomalies Genitourinary tract anomalies. See Orphanet ¹³ for full list of >100 HPO terms (and their reported frequency). Pathology findings and laboratory findings (non-cancer related) include progressive bone marrow failure (unrelated to cancer treatment) aplastic anemia Myelodysplastic syndrome Inordinate toxicities from chemotherapy or radiation macrocytosis cytopenia (especially thrombocytopenia, leukopenia, and neutropenia) increased fetal hemoglobin (often precedes anemia). Note: FA patients with very early onset cancer (≤5yr) may not present with hematologic disease, which is reported to have median age at onset of 7 years in FA patients in general¹⁴ Cancer diagnosis ≤5yr, particularly Blood cancers (AML) Brain cancers (medulloblastoma, neuroblastoma) Wilms Tumor Specifications are adapted from definitions from GeneReviews (last revision June 3, 2021) Not Applicable Comments: Multiple such cases are additive, Phenotype considerations are detailed in the rules, frequency of >.01% should not use PM3; Observations in cis are not applicable. Source information is considered (laboratory vs database setting).
PM4 PVS1 PS1 PS2 PS3 PS4 PM1 PM2 PM3 PM4 PM5 PM6 PP1 PP2 PP3 PP4 PP5 BA1 BS1 BS2 BS3 BS4 BP1 BP2 BP3 BP4 BP5 BP6 BP7 Files References
Original ACMG Summary Protein length changes due to in-frame deletions/insertions in a non-repeat region or stop-loss variants. Stand Alone Very Strong Strong Moderate Supporting Instructions: Do not use for in-frame insertions or deletions less than a single exon; Use for stop-loss variants, only. Not Applicable Comments: ● Do not use for in-frame deletions/insertions that are not already PVS1-eligible as no information is available to justify the application of this rule. ● In addition, missense and small in-frame indels are not yet confirmed as a mechanism of disease for PALB2. ● Do not use for stop-loss due to lack of data on stop-loss variants.
PM5 PVS1 PS1 PS2 PS3 PS4 PM1 PM2 PM3 PM4 PM5 PM6 PP1 PP2 PP3 PP4 PP5 BA1 BS1 BS2 BS3 BS4 BP1 BP2 BP3 BP4 BP5 BP6 BP7 Files References
Original ACMG Summary Novel missense change at an amino acid residue where a different missense change determined to be pathogenic has been seen before. Example: Arg156His is pathogenic; now you observe Arg156Cys. Caveat: Beware of changes that impact splicing rather than at the amino acid/protein level. Stand Alone Very Strong Strong Moderate Supporting Apply to frameshifting or truncating variants with premature termination codons upstream of p.Tyr1183, based on location of the most C-terminal known pathogenic variant, p.Tyr1183* Modification Type: Gene-specific,Strength Instructions: For protein: Do not use. Missense changes are not yet confirmed as a mechanism of disease for PALB2. Apply as PM5_Supporting to frameshifting or truncating variants with premature termination codons upstream of p.Tyr1183, based on location of the most C-terminal known pathogenic variant, p.Tyr1183* Apply to splice variants as PM5_supporting for splice variants can only be applied for variants premature termination codons upstream of p.Tyr1183 where PVS1_VS(RNA) is applied based on high quality observed splicing impact and must be NMD prone Not Applicable Comments: No rescue splicing isoforms have been identified in ATM.
PM6 PVS1 PS1 PS2 PS3 PS4 PM1 PM2 PM3 PM4 PM5 PM6 PP1 PP2 PP3 PP4 PP5 BA1 BS1 BS2 BS3 BS4 BP1 BP2 BP3 BP4 BP5 BP6 BP7 Files References
Original ACMG Summary Assumed de novo, but without confirmation of paternity and maternity. Stand Alone Very Strong Strong Moderate Supporting Not Applicable Comments: Do not use for AD or AR disease: Informative de novo occurrences have not yet been observed and de novo AR conditions are unlikely to be informed by phase
PP1 PVS1 PS1 PS2 PS3 PS4 PM1 PM2 PM3 PM4 PM5 PM6 PP1 PP2 PP3 PP4 PP5 BA1 BS1 BS2 BS3 BS4 BP1 BP2 BP3 BP4 BP5 BP6 BP7 Files References
Original ACMG Summary Co-segregation with disease in multiple affected family members in a gene definitively known to cause the disease. Note: May be used as stronger evidence with increasing segregation data. Stand Alone Very Strong Strong LOD ≥1.26 or Bayes Factor (LR) ≥18:1 Modification Type: Gene-specific Moderate LOD ≥.60 or Bayes Factor (LR) ≥4:1 Modification Type: Gene-specific Supporting LOD ≥0.3 or Bayes Factor (LR) ≥2:1 Modification Type: Gene-specific Instructions: AD Condition: use as per Co-Segregation Guidelines AR Condition: informative instances of co-segregation in FANCN families are too rare to be considered for weight at this time. Co-Segregation Guidelines Quantitative co-segregation analysis is mandated for more accurate assessment of causality for PALB2 alterations. It is strongly preferred that biocurators use a quantitative method that accommodates both pathologies of AD PALB2: breast cancer, ovarian cancer and pancreatic cancer. These methods may be conducted by biostatisticians, particularly if they are able to compute LR scores⁹ using multiple phenotypes. PP1_Strong: LOD ≥1.26 or Bayes Factor (LR) ≥18:1 PP1_Moderate: LOD ≥.60 or Bayes Factor (LR) ≥4:1 PP1: LOD ≥0.3 or Bayes Factor (LR) ≥2:18 BS4_Supporting: LOD ≤-.32 or Bayes Factor (LR) ≤.48 BS4_Moderate: LOD ≤ -.64 or Bayes Factor (LR) ≤.23 BS4: LOD ≤ -1.28 or Bayes Factor (LR) LR≤.053:1 A freely available tool, COOL (COsegregation OnLine) from Bing-Jian Feng’s laboratory can be used to calculate LoD scores for co-segregation analysis 1. Navigate to COOL (COsegregation OnLine)⁷ 2. Input ‘PALB2’ into the ‘Input a Gene Symbol’ field (the PALB2 defaults are approved by this VCEP) 3. Upload your Pedigree File (see COOL (COsegregation OnLine) manual⁸ for formatting) 4. Leave all defaults as is. Select ‘Submit’ to obtain LR based on Full Likelihood Bayes (FLB) Not Applicable Comments: Informative pedigrees for segregation in families with AR Ataxia-Telangiectasia are not available. However, this VCEP would consider rules similar to the Glanzman and Hearing Loss VCEP rules if a pedigree becomes available.
PP2 PVS1 PS1 PS2 PS3 PS4 PM1 PM2 PM3 PM4 PM5 PM6 PP1 PP2 PP3 PP4 PP5 BA1 BS1 BS2 BS3 BS4 BP1 BP2 BP3 BP4 BP5 BP6 BP7 Files References
Original ACMG Summary Missense variant in a gene that has a low rate of benign missense variation and where missense variants are a common mechanism of disease. Stand Alone Very Strong Strong Moderate Supporting Not Applicable Comments: Do not use. Missense is not yet confirmed or refuted as a mechanism of disease for PALB2
PP3 PVS1 PS1 PS2 PS3 PS4 PM1 PM2 PM3 PM4 PM5 PM6 PP1 PP2 PP3 PP4 PP5 BA1 BS1 BS2 BS3 BS4 BP1 BP2 BP3 BP4 BP5 BP6 BP7 Files References
Original ACMG Summary Multiple lines of computational evidence support a deleterious effect on the gene or gene product (conservation, evolutionary, splicing impact, etc.). Caveat: As many in silico algorithms use the same or very similar input for their predictions, each algorithm should not be counted as an independent criterion. PP3 can be used only once in any evaluation of a variant. Stand Alone Very Strong Strong Moderate Supporting Protein: Do not use. RNA: At least one well-established in silico predictor (e.g. SpliceAI) shows impact on splicing Modification Type: General recommendation Instructions: Protein: Do not use. So far, published predictors have yet to achieve functional outcome for PALB2 missense variants RNA: At least one well-established in silico predictor (e.g. SpliceAI) shows impact on splicing NOTE: Splice analysis needs to be considered for all variant types (including missense, frameshift, nonsense, etc. as any variant has the potential to impact splicing which may preclude any expected protein effects) NOTE: PP3 for splice predictions may not be applied in addition to PVS1 or PVS1_Variable(RNA) codes. Use caution in applying the wrong type of computational evidence (protein vs. RNA) towards the cumulative body of evidence for the opposite mechanism. Not Applicable Comments: Check splicing scores for all variant types. Do not combine splice prediction weight with other lines of protein evidence.
PP4 PVS1 PS1 PS2 PS3 PS4 PM1 PM2 PM3 PM4 PM5 PM6 PP1 PP2 PP3 PP4 PP5 BA1 BS1 BS2 BS3 BS4 BP1 BP2 BP3 BP4 BP5 BP6 BP7 Files References
Original ACMG Summary Patient’s phenotype or family history is highly specific for a disease with a single genetic etiology. Stand Alone Very Strong Strong Moderate Supporting Not Applicable Comments: Do not use for AD disorder as breast cancer is a disease with multiple genetic etiology (genetic heterogeneity) and there are no features that can readily distinguish hereditary from sporadic causes. For AR disorder, use PM3 for specific phenotype considerations
PP5
Original ACMG Summary Reputable source recently reports variant as pathogenic, but the evidence is not available to the laboratory to perform an independent evaluation. Not Applicable This criterion is not for use as recommended by the ClinGen Sequence Variant Interpretation VCEP Review Committee. PubMed : 29543229
BA1 PVS1 PS1 PS2 PS3 PS4 PM1 PM2 PM3 PM4 PM5 PM6 PP1 PP2 PP3 PP4 PP5 BA1 BS1 BS2 BS3 BS4 BP1 BP2 BP3 BP4 BP5 BP6 BP7 Files References
Original ACMG Summary Allele frequency is above 5% in Exome Sequencing Project, 1000 Genomes or Exome Aggregation Consortium. Stand Alone GnomAD Filtering Allele Frequency Allele frequency >0.1% Modification Type: Disease-specific,Gene-specific Very Strong Strong Moderate Supporting Instructions: Rounded from .118% established using Whiffin calculator¹⁰: Prevalence (breast cancer): 1:8 Allelic Heterogeneity: 1 (differs from BS1) Genetic Heterogeneity: .01 Penetrance: .53 Not Applicable Comments: FAF is a statistical model that accounts for population size and founder populations.
BS1 PVS1 PS1 PS2 PS3 PS4 PM1 PM2 PM3 PM4 PM5 PM6 PP1 PP2 PP3 PP4 PP5 BA1 BS1 BS2 BS3 BS4 BP1 BP2 BP3 BP4 BP5 BP6 BP7 Files References
Original ACMG Summary Allele frequency is greater than expected for disorder. Stand Alone Very Strong Strong GnomAD Filtering Allele Frequency greater than expected for disease >.01% Modification Type: Disease-specific,Gene-specific Moderate Supporting Instructions: Rounded from .0118% established using Whiffin calculator¹⁰: Prevalence (breast cancer): 8 Allelic Heterogeneity: 0.1 (differs from BA1) Genetic Heterogeneity: .01 Penetrance: .53 Not Applicable Comments: FAF is a statistical model that accounts for population size and founder populations.
BS2 PVS1 PS1 PS2 PS3 PS4 PM1 PM2 PM3 PM4 PM5 PM6 PP1 PP2 PP3 PP4 PP5 BA1 BS1 BS2 BS3 BS4 BP1 BP2 BP3 BP4 BP5 BP6 BP7 Files References
Original ACMG Summary Observed in a healthy adult individual for a recessive (homozygous), dominant (heterozygous), or X-linked (hemizygous) disorder, with full penetrance expected at an early age. Stand Alone Very Strong Strong Per Fanconi Anemia BS2 tables Modification Type: Disease-specific Moderate Per Fanconi Anemia BS2 tables Modification Type: Disease-specific Supporting Per Fanconi Anemia BS2 tables Modification Type: Disease-specific Instructions: See Fanconi Anemia BS2 tables Do not use for individuals in population based cohorts, such as gnomAD Consider multiple instances of co-occurrence with the same variant are more likely to be in cis in unrelated individuals when assessing BS2 application Not Applicable
BS3 PVS1 PS1 PS2 PS3 PS4 PM1 PM2 PM3 PM4 PM5 PM6 PP1 PP2 PP3 PP4 PP5 BA1 BS1 BS2 BS3 BS4 BP1 BP2 BP3 BP4 BP5 BP6 BP7 Files References
Original ACMG Summary Well-established in vitro or in vivo functional studies show no damaging effect on protein function or splicing. Stand Alone Very Strong Strong Moderate Supporting Instructions: For protein, see detailed notes on ATM-specific assays; For RNA use code BP7_O and modulate strength based on assay quality and quantity (curator discretion). Not Applicable Comments: ● Do not use: Protein functional studies (BS3) See PS3 for details ● RNA functional studies (Use BP7_Variable(RNA))
BS4 PVS1 PS1 PS2 PS3 PS4 PM1 PM2 PM3 PM4 PM5 PM6 PP1 PP2 PP3 PP4 PP5 BA1 BS1 BS2 BS3 BS4 BP1 BP2 BP3 BP4 BP5 BP6 BP7 Files References
Original ACMG Summary Lack of segregation in affected members of a family. Caveat: The presence of phenocopies for common phenotypes (i.e. cancer, epilepsy) can mimic lack of segregation among affected individuals. Also, families may have more than one pathogenic variant contributing to an autosomal dominant disorder, further confounding an apparent lack of segregation. Stand Alone Very Strong Strong LOD ≤ -1.28 or Bayes Factor (LR) LR≤.053:1 Modification Type: Gene-specific Moderate LOD ≤ -.64 or Bayes Factor (LR) ≤.23 Modification Type: Gene-specific Supporting LOD ≤-.32 or Bayes Factor (LR) ≤.48 Modification Type: Gene-specific Instructions: Quantitative co-segregation analysis is mandated for more accurate assessment of causality for PALB2 alterations. It is strongly preferred that biocurators use a quantitative method that accommodates both pathologies of AD PALB2: breast cancer, ovarian cancer and pancreatic cancer. These methods may be conducted by biostatisticians, particularly if they are able to compute LR scores⁹ using multiple phenotypes. PP1_Strong: LOD ≥1.26 or Bayes Factor (LR) ≥18:1 PP1_Moderate: LOD ≥.60 or Bayes Factor (LR) ≥4:1 PP1: LOD ≥0.3 or Bayes Factor (LR) ≥2:1 BS4_Supporting: LOD ≤-.32 or Bayes Factor (LR) ≤.48 BS4_Moderate: LOD ≤ -.64 or Bayes Factor (LR) ≤.23 BS4: LOD ≤ -1.28 or Bayes Factor (LR) LR≤.053:1 A freely available tool, COOL (COsegregation OnLine) from Bing-Jian Feng’s laboratory can be used to calculate LoD scores for co-segregation analysis 1. Navigate to COOL (COsegregation OnLine)¹¹ 2. Input ‘PALB2’ into the ‘Input a Gene Symbol’ field (the PALB2 defaults are approved by this VCEP) 3. Upload your Pedigree File (see COOL (COsegregation OnLine) manual¹² for formatting) 4. Leave all defaults as is. Select ‘Submit’ to obtain LR based on Full Likelihood Bayes (FLB) Not Applicable
BP1 PVS1 PS1 PS2 PS3 PS4 PM1 PM2 PM3 PM4 PM5 PM6 PP1 PP2 PP3 PP4 PP5 BA1 BS1 BS2 BS3 BS4 BP1 BP2 BP3 BP4 BP5 BP6 BP7 Files References
Original ACMG Summary Missense variant in a gene for which primarily truncating variants are known to cause disease. Stand Alone Very Strong Strong Moderate Supporting Apply to all missense variants. Modification Type: Gene-specific Instructions: Based on published and unpublished functional studies, PALB2 has a low rate of missense variants that are non-functional in relevant assays. True missense pathogenic variants are not yet confirmed or refuted but are thought to be exceedingly rare. Given the very low likelihood that missense variants are pathogenic, this rule applies to all missense variants in PALB2. Not Applicable
BP2 PVS1 PS1 PS2 PS3 PS4 PM1 PM2 PM3 PM4 PM5 PM6 PP1 PP2 PP3 PP4 PP5 BA1 BS1 BS2 BS3 BS4 BP1 BP2 BP3 BP4 BP5 BP6 BP7 Files References
Original ACMG Summary Observed in trans with a pathogenic variant for a fully penetrant dominant gene/disorder or observed in cis with a pathogenic variant in any inheritance pattern. Stand Alone Very Strong Strong Moderate Supporting Instructions: Use ATM PM3/BP2 table. Not Applicable Comments: Do not use: See Fanconi Anemia BS2 table
BP3 PVS1 PS1 PS2 PS3 PS4 PM1 PM2 PM3 PM4 PM5 PM6 PP1 PP2 PP3 PP4 PP5 BA1 BS1 BS2 BS3 BS4 BP1 BP2 BP3 BP4 BP5 BP6 BP7 Files References
Original ACMG Summary In frame-deletions/insertions in a repetitive region without a known function. Stand Alone Very Strong Strong Moderate Supporting Not Applicable Comments: Do not use: small in-frame losses are neither confirmed nor refuted as a mechanism of pathogenicity for PALB2. In addition, PALB2 is not considered to have repetitive regions without known function
BP4 PVS1 PS1 PS2 PS3 PS4 PM1 PM2 PM3 PM4 PM5 PM6 PP1 PP2 PP3 PP4 PP5 BA1 BS1 BS2 BS3 BS4 BP1 BP2 BP3 BP4 BP5 BP6 BP7 Files References
Original ACMG Summary Multiple lines of computational evidence suggest no impact on gene or gene product (conservation, evolutionary, splicing impact, etc) Caveat: As many in silico algorithms use the same or very similar input for their predictions, each algorithm cannot be counted as an independent criterion. BP4 can be used only once in any evaluation of a variant. Stand Alone Very Strong Strong Moderate Supporting ● Protein: Do not use. So far, published predictors have yet to achieve functional outcome for PALB2 missense variants ● RNA: At least one well-established in silico predictor (e.g. SpliceAI) shows no impact on splicing o NOTE: Splice analysis needs to be considered for all variant types (including missense, frameshift, nonsense, etc. as any variant has the potential to impact splicing which may preclude any expected protein effects) o NOTE: BP4 for splice predictions may not be applied in conjunction with BP7_Variable(RNA) (a lack of observed RNA defect) o Use caution in applying the wrong type of computational evidence (protein vs. RNA) towards the cumulative body of evidence for the opposite mechanism. Modification Type: General recommendation Instructions: ● Protein: Do not use. So far, published predictors have yet to achieve functional outcome for PALB2 missense variants ● RNA: At least one well-established in silico predictor (e.g. SpliceAI) shows no impact on splicing o NOTE: Splice analysis needs to be considered for all variant types (including missense, frameshift, nonsense, etc. as any variant has the potential to impact splicing which may preclude any expected protein effects) o NOTE: BP4 for splice predictions may not be applied in conjunction with BP7_Variable(RNA) (a lack of observed RNA defect) o Use caution in applying the wrong type of computational evidence (protein vs. RNA) towards the cumulative body of evidence for the opposite mechanism. Not Applicable Comments: ● Protein: Do not use. So far, published predictors have yet to achieve functional outcome for PALB2 missense variants ● RNA: At least one well-established in silico predictor (e.g. SpliceAI) shows impact on splicing o NOTE: Splice analysis needs to be considered for all variant types (including missense, frameshift, nonsense, etc. as any variant has the potential to impact splicing which may preclude any expected protein effects) o NOTE: BP4 for splice predictions may not be applied in conjunction with BP7_Variable(RNA) (a lack of observed RNA defect) o Use caution in applying the wrong type of computational evidence (protein vs. RNA) towards the cumulative body of evidence for the opposite mechanism.
BP5 PVS1 PS1 PS2 PS3 PS4 PM1 PM2 PM3 PM4 PM5 PM6 PP1 PP2 PP3 PP4 PP5 BA1 BS1 BS2 BS3 BS4 BP1 BP2 BP3 BP4 BP5 BP6 BP7 Files References
Original ACMG Summary Variant found in a case with an alternate molecular basis for disease. Stand Alone Very Strong Strong Moderate Supporting Not Applicable Comments: Do not use: Cases with multiple pathogenic variants have been observed with no noticeable difference in phenotype (e.g. BRCA1 and BRCA2). In addition, PALB2 has moderate penetrance and will naturally occur with other pathogenic variants more frequently due to higher tolerance/presence in the general population.
BP6
Original ACMG Summary Reputable source recently reports variant as benign, but the evidence is not available to the laboratory to perform an independent evaluation. Not Applicable This criterion is not for use as recommended by the ClinGen Sequence Variant Interpretation VCEP Review Committee. PubMed : 29543229
BP7 PVS1 PS1 PS2 PS3 PS4 PM1 PM2 PM3 PM4 PM5 PM6 PP1 PP2 PP3 PP4 PP5 BA1 BS1 BS2 BS3 BS4 BP1 BP2 BP3 BP4 BP5 BP6 BP7 Files References
Original ACMG Summary A synonymous variant for which splicing prediction algorithms predict no impact to the splice consensus sequence nor the creation of a new splice site AND the nucleotide is not highly conserved. Stand Alone Very Strong Strong BP7_Strong(RNA): Observed lack of aberrant RNA defect for silent substitutions and intronic variants. May reduce weight applied depending on assay quality. Modification Type: General recommendation Moderate BP7_Variable(RNA):Observed Lack of aberrant RNA defect with variable weight applied depending on assay quality Modification Type: General recommendation Supporting BP7: Synonymous and deep intronic BP7_Variable(RNA): Observed Lack of aberrant RNA defect with variable weight applied depending on assay quality Modification Type: General recommendation Instructions: BP7: Synonymous and deep intronic Can be used for deep intronic variants beyond (but not including) +7 (donor) and -21 (acceptor) May also apply BP4 to achieve Likely Benign Is not considered a conflicting piece of evidence against a body of evidence supporting a pathogenic splice defect BP7_Variable(RNA): RNA functional studies Lack of aberrant splice defect: Please see PVS1_Variable(RNA) section (above) for guidance on baseline weights and modifications of weight based on quality for RNA assays NOTE: BP4 splice predictions may not be used in conjunction with BP7_variable(RNA) Not Applicable Comments: BP4 may be used in addition to BP7 for sysnonymous and deep intronic variants to achieve LB; BP7 is not a conflicting piece of evidence against an otherwise pathogenic body of evidence; BP7_O should NOT be used in conjunction with BP4.

Rules for Combining Criteria

Pathogenic

≥ 2 Strong (PVS1_Strong, PS1, PS4, PM3_Strong, PP1_Strong)

1 Strong (PVS1_Strong, PS1, PS4, PM3_Strong, PP1_Strong) AND ≥ 3 Moderate (PVS1_Moderate, PS1_Moderate, PM3, PP1_Moderate)

1 Strong (PVS1_Strong, PS1, PS4, PM3_Strong, PP1_Strong) AND 2 Moderate (PVS1_Moderate, PS1_Moderate, PM3, PP1_Moderate) AND ≥ 2 Supporting (PVS1_Supporting, PS1_Supporting, PM2_Supporting, PM3_Supporting, PM5_Supporting, PP1, PP3)

1 Strong (PVS1_Strong, PS1, PS4, PM3_Strong, PP1_Strong) AND 1 Moderate (PVS1_Moderate, PS1_Moderate, PM3, PP1_Moderate) AND ≥ 4 Supporting (PVS1_Supporting, PS1_Supporting, PM2_Supporting, PM3_Supporting, PM5_Supporting, PP1, PP3)

1 Very Strong (PVS1) AND 1 Strong (PS1, PS4, PM3_Strong, PP1_Strong)

1 Very Strong (PVS1) AND ≥ 2 Moderate (PS1_Moderate, PM3, PP1_Moderate)

1 Very Strong (PVS1) AND 1 Moderate (PS1_Moderate, PM3, PP1_Moderate) AND 1 Supporting (PS1_Supporting, PM2_Supporting, PM3_Supporting, PM5_Supporting, PP1)

1 Very Strong (PVS1) AND ≥ 2 Supporting (PS1_Supporting, PM2_Supporting, PM3_Supporting, PM5_Supporting, PP1)

Likely Pathogenic

1 Strong (PVS1_Strong, PS1, PS4, PM3_Strong, PP1_Strong) AND 1 Moderate (PVS1_Moderate, PS1_Moderate, PM3, PP1_Moderate)

1 Strong (PVS1_Strong, PS1, PS4, PM3_Strong, PP1_Strong) AND ≥ 2 Supporting (PVS1_Supporting, PS1_Supporting, PM2_Supporting, PM3_Supporting, PM5_Supporting, PP1, PP3)

≥ 3 Moderate (PVS1_Moderate, PS1_Moderate, PM3, PP1_Moderate)

2 Moderate (PVS1_Moderate, PS1_Moderate, PM3, PP1_Moderate) AND ≥ 2 Supporting (PVS1_Supporting, PS1_Supporting, PM2_Supporting, PM3_Supporting, PM5_Supporting, PP1, PP3)

1 Moderate (PVS1_Moderate, PS1_Moderate, PM3, PP1_Moderate) AND ≥ 4 Supporting (PVS1_Supporting, PS1_Supporting, PM2_Supporting, PM3_Supporting, PM5_Supporting, PP1, PP3)

1 Strong (PVS1_Strong, PS1, PS4, PM3_Strong, PP1_Strong) AND 2 Moderate (PVS1_Moderate, PS1_Moderate, PM3, PP1_Moderate)

1 Very Strong (PVS1) AND 1 Moderate (PS1_Moderate, PM3, PP1_Moderate)

1 Very Strong (PVS1) AND 1 Supporting (PS1_Supporting, PM2_Supporting, PM3_Supporting, PM5_Supporting, PP1)

Benign

≥ 2 Strong (BS1, BS2, BS4, BP7_Strong)

1 Stand Alone (BA1)

Likely Benign

1 Strong (BS1, BS2, BS4, BP7_Strong)

1 Strong (BS1, BS2, BS4, BP7_Strong) AND 1 Supporting (BS2_Supporting, BS4_Supporting, BP1, BP4, BP7)

≥ 2 Supporting (BS2_Supporting, BS4_Supporting, BP1, BP4, BP7)

Files & Images

PALB2 Exon and Domain Maps:

PALB2 PVS1 Decision Tree:

PALB2 PM3 and BS2 Tables:

PALB2 PS1 table :

References

1. Lopez-Perolio I Leman R et al. Alternative splicing and ACMG-AMP-2015-based classification of PALB2 genetic variants: an ENIGMA report. J Med Genet (2019) 56 (7) p. 453-460. 10.1136/jmedgenet-2018-105834 30890586

2. Abou Tayoun AN Pesaran T et al. Recommendations for interpreting the loss of function PVS1 ACMG/AMP variant criterion. Hum Mutat (2018) 39 (11) p. 1517-1524. 10.1002/humu.23626 30192042

3. Ducy M Sesma-Sanz L et al. The Tumor Suppressor PALB2: Inside Out. Trends Biochem Sci (2019) 44 (3) p. 226-240. 10.1016/j.tibs.2018.10.008 30638972

4. Reid S Schindler D et al. Biallelic mutations in PALB2 cause Fanconi anemia subtype FA-N and predispose to childhood cancer. Nat Genet (2007) 39 (2) p. 162-4. 10.1038/ng1947 17200671

5. Thermann R Neu-Yilik G et al. Binary specification of nonsense codons by splicing and cytoplasmic translation. EMBO J (1998) 17 (12) p. 3484-94. 10.1093/emboj/17.12.3484 9628884

6. Carter MS Doskow J et al. A regulatory mechanism that detects premature nonsense codons in T-cell receptor transcripts in vivo is reversed by protein synthesis inhibitors in vitro. J Biol Chem (1995) 270 (48) p. 28995-9003. 10.1074/jbc.270.48.28995 7499432

7. [https://fengbj-laboratory.org/cool2/server.uu.html](https://fengbj-laboratory.org/cool2/server.uu.html)

8. [https://fengbj-laboratory.org/cool2/manual.html](https://fengbj-laboratory.org/cool2/manual.html)

9. Tavtigian SV Greenblatt MS et al. Modeling the ACMG/AMP variant classification guidelines as a Bayesian classification framework. Genet Med (2018) 20 (9) p. 1054-1060. 10.1038/gim.2017.210 29300386

10. [http://cardiodb.org/allelefrequencyapp/](http://cardiodb.org/allelefrequencyapp/:)

11. https://fengbj-laboratory.org/cool2/server.uu.html

12. https://fengbj-laboratory.org/cool2/manual.html

13. https://www.orpha.net/consor/cgi-bin/Disease_HPOTerms_Simple.php?lng=EN

14. Ebens CL MacMillan ML et al. Hematopoietic cell transplantation in Fanconi anemia: current evidence, challenges and recommendations. Expert Rev Hematol (2017) 10 (1) p. 81-97. 10.1080/17474086.2016.1268048 27929686