Criteria Specification (CSpec) Registry is intended to provide access to the Criteria Specifications used and applied by ClinGen Variant Curation Expert Panels and biocurators in the classification of variants.
For general information about the ClinGen Expert Panels and Variant Curation please visit: Clinical Domain Working Groups. For specific inquiries regarding content correction or adding a new criteria specification refer to the Help page.
Should you encounter any issues regarding the data displayed, lack of functionality or other problems, please let us know by contacting us via email.
Criteria & Strength Specifications
|
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
PVS1 | ||||
Original ACMG Summary
Null variant (nonsense, frameshift, canonical +/−1 or 2 splice sites, initiation codon, single or multi-exon deletion) in a gene where loss of function (LOF) is a known mechanism of disease.
Caveats: • Beware of genes where LOF is not a known disease mechanism (e.g. GFAP, MYH7). • Use caution interpreting LOF variants at the extreme 3’ end of a gene. • Use caution with splice variants that are predicted to lead to exon skipping but leave the remainder of the protein intact. • Use caution in the presence of multiple transcripts. Stand Alone
Very Strong
Please see attached CAPN3 PVS1 flowchart. In addition, follow the SVI Working Group’s recommendations (Walker et al. 2023; PMID: 37352859) for any variant for which an impact on splicing has been experimentally demonstrated OR is predicted to affect splicing but occurs outside of a donor/acceptor +/-1,2 dinucleotide position.
Modification Type:
General recommendation,Gene-specific
Strong
Please see attached CAPN3 PVS1 flowchart. In addition, follow the SVI Working Group’s recommendations (Walker et al. 2023; PMID: 37352859) for any variant for which an impact on splicing has been experimentally demonstrated OR is predicted to affect splicing but occurs outside of a donor/acceptor +/-1,2 dinucleotide position.
Modification Type:
General recommendation,Gene-specific,Strength
Moderate
Please see attached CAPN3 PVS1 flowchart. In addition, follow the SVI Working Group’s recommendations (Walker et al. 2023; PMID: 37352859) for any variant for which an impact on splicing has been experimentally demonstrated OR is predicted to affect splicing but occurs outside of a donor/acceptor +/-1,2 dinucleotide position.
Modification Type:
General recommendation,Gene-specific,Strength
Supporting
Please see attached CAPN3 PVS1 flowchart. In addition, follow the SVI Working Group’s recommendations (Walker et al. 2023; PMID: 37352859) for any variant for which an impact on splicing has been experimentally demonstrated OR is predicted to affect splicing but occurs outside of a donor/acceptor +/-1,2 dinucleotide position.
Modification Type:
General recommendation,Gene-specific,Strength
Not Applicable
|
||||
PS1 | ||||
Original ACMG Summary
Same amino acid change as a previously established pathogenic variant regardless of nucleotide change.
Example: Val->Leu caused by either G>C or G>T in the same codon. Caveat: Beware of changes that impact splicing rather than at the amino acid/protein level. Stand Alone
Very Strong
Strong
For missense variants for which the amino acid change is the expected mechanism of disease, apply at Strong for 1 pathogenic or 2 likely pathogenic variants resulting in the same amino acid change. The likely pathogenic or pathogenic variant(s) must have been classified using LGMD VCEP specifications, and potential splice effects must be excluded for the missense variant under curation and the variant(s) resulting in the same amino acid change (SpliceAI score ≤0.10 or experimental evidence of normal splicing). PS1 can potentially be applied to multiple nucleotide changes at the same residue as long as the variant classification that determines the strength level does not depend on PS1 application. For missense variants encoded by the first or last 3 nucleotides of an exon, PS1 should be considered only in the context of altered splicing (see below), unless a splice effect has been experimentally ruled out for the variant under curation and the variant(s) resulting in the same amino acid change. For variants for which the nucleotide change is the expected mechanism of disease (altered splicing), follow SVI Working Group recommendations (Walker et al. 2023; PMID: 37352859).
Modification Type:
Disease-specific,General recommendation
Moderate
For missense variants for which the amino acid change is the expected mechanism of disease, apply at Moderate for 1 likely pathogenic variant resulting in the same amino acid change. The likely pathogenic variant must have been classified using LGMD VCEP specifications, and potential splice effects must be excluded for the missense variant under curation and the variant resulting in the same amino acid change (SpliceAI score ≤0.10 or experimental evidence of normal splicing). PS1 can potentially be applied to multiple nucleotide changes at the same residue as long as the variant classification that determines the strength level does not depend on PS1 application. For missense variants encoded by the first or last 3 nucleotides of an exon, PS1 should be considered only in the context of altered splicing (see below), unless a splice effect has been experimentally ruled out for the variant under curation and the variant(s) resulting in the same amino acid change. For variants for which the nucleotide change is the expected mechanism of disease (altered splicing), follow SVI Working Group recommendations (Walker et al. 2023; PMID: 37352859).
Modification Type:
Disease-specific,General recommendation,Strength
Supporting
For variants for which the nucleotide change is the expected mechanism of disease (altered splicing), follow SVI Working Group recommendations (Walker et al. 2023; PMID: 37352859).
Modification Type:
General recommendation,Strength
Not Applicable
|
||||
PS2 | ||||
Original ACMG Summary
De novo (both maternity and paternity confirmed) in a patient with the disease and no family history.
Note: Confirmation of paternity only is insufficient. Egg donation, surrogate motherhood, errors in embryo transfer, etc. can contribute to non-maternity. Stand Alone
Very Strong
Use the SVI Working Group’s recommended point system (see supplementary file “de novo table”). Probands meeting the criteria for at least PP4_Moderate or PP4_Strong can be counted as “Phenotype highly specific for gene”. Probands meeting the criteria for PP4 (Supporting) can be counted as “Phenotype consistent with gene but not highly specific”. Probands who do not meet the criteria for PP4 (Supporting) should not be counted. Maternity and paternity should be confirmed by trio WES or other testing. ≥ 4 pts is required to apply PS2 at Very Strong.
Modification Type:
Disease-specific,General recommendation,Strength
Strong
Use the SVI Working Group’s recommended point system (see supplementary file “de novo table”). Probands meeting the criteria for at least PP4_Moderate or PP4_Strong can be counted as “Phenotype highly specific for gene”. Probands meeting the criteria for PP4 (Supporting) can be counted as “Phenotype consistent with gene but not highly specific”. Probands who do not meet the criteria for PP4 (Supporting) should not be counted. Maternity and paternity should be confirmed by trio WES or other testing. PS2 should be applied for ≥ 2 pts but < 4 pts.
Modification Type:
Disease-specific,General recommendation
Moderate
Use the SVI Working Group’s recommended point system (see supplementary file “de novo table”). Probands meeting the criteria for at least PP4_Moderate or PP4_Strong can be counted as “Phenotype highly specific for gene”. Probands meeting the criteria for PP4 (Supporting) can be counted as “Phenotype consistent with gene but not highly specific”. Probands who do not meet the criteria for PP4 (Supporting) should not be counted. Maternity and paternity should be confirmed by trio WES or other testing. PS2_Moderate should be applied for ≥ 1 pt but < 2 pts.
Modification Type:
Disease-specific,General recommendation,Strength
Supporting
Use the SVI Working Group’s recommended point system (see supplementary file “de novo table”). Probands meeting the criteria for at least PP4_Moderate or PP4_Strong can be counted as “Phenotype highly specific for gene”. Probands meeting the criteria for PP4 (Supporting) can be counted as “Phenotype consistent with gene but not highly specific”. Probands who do not meet the criteria for PP4 (Supporting) should not be counted. Maternity and paternity should be confirmed by trio WES or other testing. PS2_Supporting should be applied for ≥ 0.5 pts but < 1 pt.
Modification Type:
Disease-specific,General recommendation,Strength
Not Applicable
|
||||
PS3 | ||||
Original ACMG Summary
Well-established in vitro or in vivo functional studies supportive of a damaging effect on the gene or gene product.
Note: Functional studies that have been validated and shown to be reproducible and robust in a clinical diagnostic laboratory setting are considered the most well-established. Stand Alone
Very Strong
Strong
Variant-specific animal models are rare but may be assessed on a case-by-case basis and PS3 applied at a strength level that reflects how well the model recapitulates features observed in human patients. Apply PS3 at Strong for a variant-specific animal model that meets all of the following conditions, regardless of species:
For CAPN3, functional studies in heterologous systems are hard to conduct and rare in the literature. Therefore, PS3 is not applicable at this time for in vitro assays for variants in CAPN3. Assays that may be considered in the future include titin ectopic expression, titin degradation assay, baculovirus-based titin cleavage assay, and assays of autolytic activity. For any variant type, experimental evidence for altered splicing should be scored under PVS1 in accordance with the decision tree for RNA splicing assay results outlined in Walker et al. 2023 (PMID: 37352859). Apply PS3 only once, for the piece of evidence that meets the highest possible strength level.
Modification Type:
Disease-specific,General recommendation
Moderate
Variant-specific animal models are rare but may be assessed on a case-by-case basis and PS3 applied at a strength level that reflects how well the model recapitulates features observed in human patients. Apply PS3_Moderate for a variant-specific animal model that meets all of the following conditions, regardless of species:
For CAPN3, functional studies in heterologous systems are hard to conduct and rare in the literature. Therefore, PS3 is not applicable at this time for in vitro assays for variants in CAPN3. Assays that may be considered in the future include titin ectopic expression, titin degradation assay, baculovirus-based titin cleavage assay, and assays of autolytic activity. For any variant type, experimental evidence for altered splicing should be scored under PVS1 in accordance with the decision tree for RNA splicing assay results outlined in Walker et al. 2023 (PMID: 37352859). Apply PS3 only once, for the piece of evidence that meets the highest possible strength level.
Modification Type:
Disease-specific,General recommendation,Gene-specific,Strength
Supporting
For CAPN3, functional studies in heterologous systems are hard to conduct and rare in the literature. Therefore, PS3 is not applicable at this time for in vitro assays for variants in CAPN3. Assays that may be considered in the future include titin ectopic expression, titin degradation assay, baculovirus-based titin cleavage assay, and assays of autolytic activity. For any variant type, experimental evidence for altered splicing should be scored under PVS1 in accordance with the decision tree for RNA splicing assay results outlined in Walker et al. 2023 (PMID: 37352859). Apply PS3 only once, for the piece of evidence that meets the highest possible strength level.
Modification Type:
Disease-specific,General recommendation,Gene-specific,Strength
Not Applicable
|
||||
PS4 | ||||
Original ACMG Summary
The prevalence of the variant in affected individuals is significantly increased compared to the prevalence in controls.
Note 1: Relative risk (RR) or odds ratio (OR), as obtained from case-control studies, is >5.0 and the confidence interval around the estimate of RR or OR does not include 1.0. See manuscript for detailed guidance. Note 2: In instances of very rare variants where case-control studies may not reach statistical significance, the prior observation of the variant in multiple unrelated patients with the same phenotype, and its absence in controls, may be used as moderate level of evidence. Stand Alone
Very Strong
Strong
Use without disease-specific modification if case-control studies are available.
Modification Type:
Clarification
Moderate
Supporting
Not Applicable
|
||||
PM1 | ||||
Original ACMG Summary
Located in a mutational hot spot and/or critical and well-established functional domain (e.g. active site of an enzyme) without benign variation.
Stand Alone
Very Strong
Strong
Moderate
Supporting
Not Applicable
Comments:
Not applicable at this time.
|
||||
PM2 | ||||
Original ACMG Summary
Absent from controls (or at extremely low frequency if recessive) in Exome Sequencing Project, 1000 Genomes or Exome Aggregation Consortium.
Caveat: Population data for indels may be poorly called by next generation sequencing. Stand Alone
Very Strong
Strong
Moderate
Supporting
Apply if the Grpmax alternate allele frequency / upper bound of the 95% confidence interval (95% CI) of the Grpmax alternate allele frequency in gnomAD is <0.0001.
Grpmax refers to the gnomAD subpopulation with the highest alternate allele frequency. Use large, non-bottlenecked genetic ancestry groups for the Grpmax; avoid using the Amish, Ashkenazi Jewish, European Finnish, Remaining, or Middle Eastern (genome). The upper bound of the 95% CI must be calculated using the exome or genome allele numbers and counts from gnomAD. Confidence interval tools, such as Confit-de-MAF (https://www.genecalculators.net/confit-de-maf.html), can be used. When comparing different versions of gnomAD for the variant frequency, use the allele count from the version with the largest allele number. For larger deletions or duplications that may not be well represented in gnomAD (e.g., single- or multi-exon events), also confirm the variant is not common in gnomAD SVs, gnomAD CNVs, or the Database of Genomic Variants (DGV) (https://dgv.tcag.ca/dgv/app/home).
Modification Type:
Disease-specific,Strength
Not Applicable
|
||||
PM3 | ||||
Original ACMG Summary
For recessive disorders, detected in trans with a pathogenic variant
Note: This requires testing of parents (or offspring) to determine phase. Stand Alone
Very Strong
Use the SVI Working Group’s recommended point system to determine PM3 strength (see supplementary file “PM3 table”). ≥ 4 pts is required to apply PM3 at Very Strong.
Modification Type:
Disease-specific,General recommendation,Strength
Strong
Use the SVI Working Group’s recommended point system to determine PM3 strength (see supplementary file “PM3 table”). PM3_Strong should be applied for ≥ 2 pts but < 4 pts.
Modification Type:
Disease-specific,General recommendation,Strength
Moderate
Use the SVI Working Group’s recommended point system to determine PM3 strength (see supplementary file “PM3 table”). PM3 (Moderate) should be applied for ≥ 1 pt but < 2 pts.
Modification Type:
Disease-specific,General recommendation
Supporting
Use the SVI Working Group’s recommended point system to determine PM3 strength (see supplementary file “PM3 table”). PM3_Supporting should be applied for ≥ 0.5 pts but < 1 pt.
Modification Type:
Disease-specific,General recommendation,Strength
Not Applicable
|
||||
PM4 | ||||
Original ACMG Summary
Protein length changes due to in-frame deletions/insertions in a non-repeat region or stop-loss variants.
Stand Alone
Very Strong
Strong
Moderate
Use as is, regardless of the length of the in-frame insertion or deletion.
Modification Type:
No change
Supporting
Not Applicable
|
||||
PM5 | ||||
Original ACMG Summary
Novel missense change at an amino acid residue where a different missense change determined to be pathogenic has been seen before.
Example: Arg156His is pathogenic; now you observe Arg156Cys. Caveat: Beware of changes that impact splicing rather than at the amino acid/protein level. Stand Alone
Very Strong
Strong
Apply only for missense variants for which the amino acid change is the expected mechanism of disease. For the missense variant under curation and the variant(s) resulting in a different amino acid change, exclude potential splice effects (SpliceAI score ≤0.10 or experimental evidence of normal splicing) and confirm the applicability of PP3. Missense changes at the same residue must be classified according to LGMD VCEP specifications, and no benign missense variation should be present at the residue. Do not apply for missense variants encoded by the first or last 3 nucleotides of an exon unless a splice effect has been experimentally ruled out for the variant under curation and the variant(s) resulting in the same amino acid change. Apply at Strong for 2 pathogenic or 3 likely pathogenic variants resulting in different amino acid changes at the same residue as the variant under curation. PM5 can potentially be applied to multiple amino acid changes at the same residue as long as the variant classification that determines the strength level does not depend on PM5 application.
Modification Type:
Disease-specific,Strength
Moderate
Apply only for missense variants for which the amino acid change is the expected mechanism of disease. For the missense variant under curation and the variant(s) resulting in a different amino acid change, exclude potential splice effects (SpliceAI score ≤0.10 or experimental evidence of normal splicing) and confirm the applicability of PP3. Missense changes at the same residue must be classified according to LGMD VCEP specifications, and no benign missense variation should be present at the residue. Do not apply for missense variants encoded by the first or last 3 nucleotides of an exon unless a splice effect has been experimentally ruled out for the variant under curation and the variant(s) resulting in the same amino acid change. Apply at Moderate for 1 pathogenic or 2 likely pathogenic variants resulting in different amino acid changes at the same residue as the variant under curation. PM5 can potentially be applied to multiple amino acid changes at the same residue as long as the variant classification that determines the strength level does not depend on PM5 application.
Modification Type:
Disease-specific
Supporting
Apply only for missense variants for which the amino acid change is the expected mechanism of disease. For the missense variant under curation and the variant(s) resulting in a different amino acid change, exclude potential splice effects (SpliceAI score ≤0.10 or experimental evidence of normal splicing) and confirm the applicability of PP3. Missense changes at the same residue must be classified according to LGMD VCEP specifications, and no benign missense variation should be present at the residue. Do not apply for missense variants encoded by the first or last 3 nucleotides of an exon unless a splice effect has been experimentally ruled out for the variant under curation and the variant resulting in the same amino acid change. Apply at Supporting for 1 likely pathogenic variant resulting in a different amino acid change at the same residue as the variant under curation. PM5 can potentially be applied to multiple amino acid changes at the same residue as long as the variant classification that determines the strength level does not depend on PM5 application.
Modification Type:
Disease-specific,Strength
Not Applicable
|
||||
PM6 | ||||
Original ACMG Summary
Assumed de novo, but without confirmation of paternity and maternity.
Stand Alone
Very Strong
Strong
Use the SVI Working Group’s recommended point system (see supplementary file “de novo table”). Probands meeting the criteria for at least PP4_Moderate or PP4_Strong can be counted as “Phenotype highly specific for gene”. Probands meeting the criteria for PP4 (Supporting) can be counted as “Phenotype consistent with gene but not highly specific”. Probands who do not meet the criteria for PP4 (Supporting) should not be counted. Maternity and paternity should be confirmed by trio WES or other testing. PM6_Strong should be applied for ≥ 2 pts but < 4 pts.
Modification Type:
Disease-specific,General recommendation,Strength
Moderate
Use the SVI Working Group’s recommended point system (see supplementary file “de novo table”). Probands meeting the criteria for at least PP4_Moderate or PP4_Strong can be counted as “Phenotype highly specific for gene”. Probands meeting the criteria for PP4 (Supporting) can be counted as “Phenotype consistent with gene but not highly specific”. Probands who do not meet the criteria for PP4 (Supporting) should not be counted. Maternity and paternity should be confirmed by trio WES or other testing. PM6 should be applied for ≥ 1 pt but < 2 pts.
Modification Type:
Disease-specific,General recommendation
Supporting
Use the SVI Working Group’s recommended point system (see supplementary file “de novo table”). Probands meeting the criteria for at least PP4_Moderate or PP4_Strong can be counted as “Phenotype highly specific for gene”. Probands meeting the criteria for PP4 (Supporting) can be counted as “Phenotype consistent with gene but not highly specific”. Probands who do not meet the criteria for PP4 (Supporting) should not be counted. Maternity and paternity should be confirmed by trio WES or other testing. PM6_Supporting should be applied for ≥ 0.5 pts but < 1 pt.
Modification Type:
Disease-specific,General recommendation,Strength
Not Applicable
|
||||
PP1 | ||||
Original ACMG Summary
Co-segregation with disease in multiple affected family members in a gene definitively known to cause the disease.
Note: May be used as stronger evidence with increasing segregation data. Stand Alone
Very Strong
Strong
Segregations should be counted across families, with the total number of segregations determining the strength level. Apply PP1_Strong for 3 affected segregations (in addition to proband) across ≥2 families. When applied together, PP1 and PP4 cannot exceed 5 Bayesian pts (Supporting + Strong or Moderate + Moderate).
Modification Type:
Disease-specific,Strength
Moderate
Segregations should be counted across families, with the total number of segregations determining the strength level. Apply PP1_Moderate for 2 affected segregations (in addition to proband; may be from a single family). When applied together, PP1 and PP4 cannot exceed 5 Bayesian pts (Supporting + Strong or Moderate + Moderate).
Modification Type:
Disease-specific,Strength
Supporting
Segregations should be counted across families, with the total number of segregations determining the strength level. Apply PP1 (Supporting) for 1 affected segregation (in addition to proband). When applied together, PP1 and PP4 cannot exceed 5 Bayesian pts (Supporting + Strong or Moderate + Moderate).
Modification Type:
Disease-specific
Not Applicable
|
||||
PP2 | ||||
Original ACMG Summary
Missense variant in a gene that has a low rate of benign missense variation and where missense variants are a common mechanism of disease.
Stand Alone
Very Strong
Strong
Moderate
Supporting
Not Applicable
Comments:
Not applicable. CAPN3 is not constrained for missense variation (Z-score <3).
|
||||
PP3 | ||||
Original ACMG Summary
Multiple lines of computational evidence support a deleterious effect on the gene or gene product (conservation, evolutionary, splicing impact, etc.).
Caveat: As many in silico algorithms use the same or very similar input for their predictions, each algorithm should not be counted as an independent criterion. PP3 can be used only once in any evaluation of a variant. Stand Alone
Very Strong
Strong
Moderate
Supporting
For missense variants, use REVEL with a score ≥0.7. For variants that may affect splicing, use SpliceAI with a score ≥0.5.
Modification Type:
Disease-specific
Not Applicable
|
||||
PP4 | ||||
Original ACMG Summary
Patient’s phenotype or family history is highly specific for a disease with a single genetic etiology.
Stand Alone
Very Strong
Strong
Use the PP4 table (see supplementary file “PP4 table CAPN3”) to determine the appropriate PP4 strength level. Apply PP4 only once, for a patient meeting the highest possible strength level. When applied together, PP1 and PP4 cannot exceed 5 Bayesian pts (Supporting + Strong or Moderate + Moderate).
Modification Type:
Disease-specific,Gene-specific,Strength
Moderate
Use the PP4 table (see supplementary file “PP4 table CAPN3”) to determine the appropriate PP4 strength level. Apply PP4 only once, for a patient meeting the highest possible strength level. When applied together, PP1 and PP4 cannot exceed 5 Bayesian pts (Supporting + Strong or Moderate + Moderate). If PP1_Moderate is applied and the criteria for PP4_Strong are also met, a downgraded PP4_Moderate can be applied.
Modification Type:
Disease-specific,Gene-specific,Strength
Supporting
Use the PP4 table (see supplementary file “PP4 table CAPN3”) to determine the appropriate PP4 strength level. Apply PP4 only once, for a patient meeting the highest possible strength level. When applied together, PP1 and PP4 cannot exceed 5 Bayesian pts (Supporting + Strong or Moderate + Moderate).
Modification Type:
Disease-specific
Not Applicable
|
||||
PP5 | ||||
Original ACMG Summary
Reputable source recently reports variant as pathogenic, but the evidence is not available to the laboratory to perform an independent evaluation.
Not Applicable
This criterion is not for use as recommended by the ClinGen Sequence Variant Interpretation VCEP Review Committee.
PubMed : 29543229
|
||||
BA1 | ||||
Original ACMG Summary
Allele frequency is above 5% in Exome Sequencing Project, 1000 Genomes or Exome Aggregation Consortium.
Stand Alone
Apply if the variant Grpmax FAF (the lower bound of the 95% confidence interval of the maximum credible genetic ancestry group allele frequency) is >0.003. This value can be taken directly from gnomAD. See supplementary file “benign frequency exceptions” for a list of variants defined as exceptions to the benign frequency rules. Ongoing updates to this list will be available at the LGMD VCEP webpage: https://clinicalgenome.org/affiliation/50061/. Variants whose frequency may not be reliable (e.g., variants that may reflect a sequencing artifact) should be critically evaluated and brought to the attention of the LGMD VCEP.
Modification Type:
Disease-specific
Very Strong
Strong
Moderate
Supporting
Not Applicable
|
||||
BS1 | ||||
Original ACMG Summary
Allele frequency is greater than expected for disorder.
Stand Alone
Very Strong
Strong
Apply if the variant Grpmax FAF (the lower bound of the 95% confidence interval of the maximum credible genetic ancestry group allele frequency) is >0.001. This value can be taken directly from gnomAD. See supplementary file “benign frequency exceptions” for a list of variants defined as exceptions to the benign frequency rules. Ongoing updates to this list will be available at the LGMD VCEP webpage: https://clinicalgenome.org/affiliation/50061/. Variants whose frequency may not be reliable (e.g., variants that may reflect a sequencing artifact) should be critically evaluated and brought to the attention of the LGMD VCEP.
Modification Type:
Disease-specific
Moderate
Supporting
Not Applicable
|
||||
BS2 | ||||
Original ACMG Summary
Observed in a healthy adult individual for a recessive (homozygous), dominant (heterozygous), or X-linked (hemizygous) disorder, with full penetrance expected at an early age.
Stand Alone
Very Strong
Strong
Moderate
Supporting
Not Applicable
Comments:
Not applicable as LGMD is characterized by variable expressivity and late-onset LGMD is not uncommon.
|
||||
BS3 | ||||
Original ACMG Summary
Well-established in vitro or in vivo functional studies show no damaging effect on protein function or splicing.
Stand Alone
Very Strong
Strong
Moderate
Supporting
Not Applicable
Comments:
Not applicable. Since the muscle disease mechanisms are complex, it is not feasible at this time to exclude all pathogenic functional abnormalities through available assays.
|
||||
BS4 | ||||
Original ACMG Summary
Lack of segregation in affected members of a family.
Caveat: The presence of phenocopies for common phenotypes (i.e. cancer, epilepsy) can mimic lack of segregation among affected individuals. Also, families may have more than one pathogenic variant contributing to an autosomal dominant disorder, further confounding an apparent lack of segregation. Stand Alone
Very Strong
Strong
Use as is. One affected individual (genotype-, phenotype+) is sufficient for BS4. Do not apply for genotype+, phenotype- individuals, as LGMD is characterized by variable expressivity and late onset is not uncommon.
Modification Type:
Clarification
Moderate
Supporting
Not Applicable
|
||||
BP1 | ||||
Original ACMG Summary
Missense variant in a gene for which primarily truncating variants are known to cause disease.
Stand Alone
Very Strong
Strong
Moderate
Supporting
Not Applicable
Comments:
Not applicable as missense variants are also known to cause disease.
|
||||
BP2 | ||||
Original ACMG Summary
Observed in trans with a pathogenic variant for a fully penetrant dominant gene/disorder or observed in cis with a pathogenic variant in any inheritance pattern.
Stand Alone
Very Strong
Strong
Moderate
Supporting
Use when variant is found in cis with a variant classified as pathogenic or likely pathogenic using the LGMD VCEP specifications.
Modification Type:
Disease-specific
Not Applicable
|
||||
BP3 | ||||
Original ACMG Summary
In frame-deletions/insertions in a repetitive region without a known function.
Stand Alone
Very Strong
Strong
Moderate
Supporting
Not Applicable
Comments:
Not applicable. Repetitive regions without a known function are not well described in CAPN3.
|
||||
BP4 | ||||
Original ACMG Summary
Multiple lines of computational evidence suggest no impact on gene or gene product (conservation, evolutionary, splicing impact, etc)
Caveat: As many in silico algorithms use the same or very similar input for their predictions, each algorithm cannot be counted as an independent criterion. BP4 can be used only once in any evaluation of a variant. Stand Alone
Very Strong
Strong
Moderate
Supporting
For missense variants, use REVEL with a score ≤0.1 AND SpliceAI with a score ≤0.05. For variants that may affect splicing, use SpliceAI with a score ≤0.05.
Modification Type:
Disease-specific
Instructions:
Splice AI scores can be calculated here: https://spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org/ Not Applicable
|
||||
BP5 | ||||
Original ACMG Summary
Variant found in a case with an alternate molecular basis for disease.
Stand Alone
Very Strong
Strong
Moderate
Supporting
Not Applicable
Comments:
Not applicable. Secondary deficiencies of related proteins are often seen in LGMD.
|
||||
BP6 | ||||
Original ACMG Summary
Reputable source recently reports variant as benign, but the evidence is not available to the laboratory to perform an independent evaluation.
Not Applicable
This criterion is not for use as recommended by the ClinGen Sequence Variant Interpretation VCEP Review Committee.
PubMed : 29543229
|
||||
BP7 | ||||
Original ACMG Summary
A synonymous variant for which splicing prediction algorithms predict no impact to the splice consensus sequence nor the creation of a new splice site AND the nucleotide is not highly conserved.
Stand Alone
Very Strong
Strong
Moderate
Supporting
For splice predictions, use SpliceAI with a score ≤0.05. BP7 may be co-applied with BP4 for synonymous, UTR, and intronic variants located outside the splice donor/acceptor regions designated in Walker et al. 2023 (+7/-21).
Modification Type:
Disease-specific
Not Applicable
|
One Baylor Plaza, MS:BCM225 Suite 400D, Houston, TX, 77030
Questions or comments?