Criteria Specification (CSpec) Registry is intended to provide access to the Criteria Specifications used and applied by ClinGen Variant Curation Expert Panels and biocurators in the classification of variants.
For general information about the ClinGen Expert Panels and Variant Curation please visit: Clinical Domain Working Groups. For specific inquiries regarding content correction or adding a new criteria specification refer to the Help page.
Should you encounter any issues regarding the data displayed, lack of functionality or other problems, please let us know by contacting us via email.
(1) New REVEL thresholds for PP3 ≥ 0.88 and for BP4 ≤ 0.50 (originally PP3 ≥ 0.75 and BP4 ≤ 0.15). (2) Use SpliceAI as the primary in-silico splicing predictor replacing MES and SSF. The thresholds for SpliceAI ≥ 0.38 for PP3 and ≤ 0.20 for BP4. (3) PP3 can be applied for missense, synonymous, intronic and non-coding variants if the variant impacts splicing, including the creation of cryptic novel splice sites. (4) New conservation threshold for phyloP100 way (GRCh38/hg38) ≤2.0 for BP7 (originally PhyloP score < 0.1). (5) New amino acid range for PM1_supporting and PM4_supporting to AA 89-204 (originally AA105-204). (6) Apply PM5_supporting to nonsense/frameshift variants that are downstream of c.98 (in transcript NM_001754.4). (7) PM2 is downgraded to PM2_supporting. (8) Use of the Bayesian point system in curations with conflicting evidence. (9) Remove the previous location requirements (+7/-21 in BP7 and ±3/±5 in PP3) for intronic variants in BP7 and PP3. And remove the usage for UTR variants in PP3/BP4/BP7.
Criteria & Strength Specifications
|
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
PVS1 | ||||
Original ACMG Summary
Null variant (nonsense, frameshift, canonical +/−1 or 2 splice sites, initiation codon, single or multi-exon deletion) in a gene where loss of function (LOF) is a known mechanism of disease.
Caveats: • Beware of genes where LOF is not a known disease mechanism (e.g. GFAP, MYH7). • Use caution interpreting LOF variants at the extreme 3’ end of a gene. • Use caution with splice variants that are predicted to lead to exon skipping but leave the remainder of the protein intact. • Use caution in the presence of multiple transcripts. Stand Alone
Very Strong
Per modified RUNX1 PVS1 decision tree for SNVs and CNVs and table of splicing effects.
Modification Type:
Gene-specific
Strong
Per modified RUNX1 PVS1 decision tree for SNVs and CNVs and table of splicing effects.
Modification Type:
Gene-specific,Strength
Moderate
Per modified RUNX1 PVS1 decision tree for SNVs and CNVs and table of splicing effects.
Modification Type:
Disease-specific,Strength
Supporting
Not Applicable
|
||||
PS1 | ||||
Original ACMG Summary
Same amino acid change as a previously established pathogenic variant regardless of nucleotide change.
Example: Val->Leu caused by either G>C or G>T in the same codon. Caveat: Beware of changes that impact splicing rather than at the amino acid/protein level. Stand Alone
Very Strong
Strong
Same amino acid change as a previously established pathogenic variant regardless of nucleotide change.
Modification Type:
None
Moderate
Same amino acid change as a previously established likely pathogenic variant regardless of nucleotide change.
Modification Type:
Strength
Supporting
Not Applicable
|
||||
PS2 | ||||
Original ACMG Summary
De novo (both maternity and paternity confirmed) in a patient with the disease and no family history.
Note: Confirmation of paternity only is insufficient. Egg donation, surrogate motherhood, errors in embryo transfer, etc. can contribute to non-maternity. Stand Alone
Very Strong
Strong
Moderate
Phenotypic specificity category: “Phenotype consistent with gene but not highly specific and high genetic heterogeneity”. For each proven de novo case give 0.5 points, for each assumed de novo case give 0.25 point. Moderate = 1.0 points total.
Modification Type:
Disease-specific,Strength
Supporting
Phenotypic specificity category: “Phenotype consistent with gene but not highly specific and high genetic heterogeneity”. For each proven de novo case give 0.5 points, for each assumed de novo case give 0.25 point. Supporting = 0.5 points total.
Modification Type:
Disease-specific,Strength
Not Applicable
|
||||
PS3 | ||||
Original ACMG Summary
Well-established in vitro or in vivo functional studies supportive of a damaging effect on the gene or gene product.
Note: Functional studies that have been validated and shown to be reproducible and robust in a clinical diagnostic laboratory setting are considered the most well-established. Stand Alone
Very Strong
Strong
Transactivation assays demonstrating altered transactivation (<20% of wt, and/or reduced to levels similar to well established pathogenic variants such as R201Q or R166Q) AND data from a secondary assay demonstrating altered function. Not applicable if variant meets PVS1. If variant meets PVS1_strong, either apply PS3_moderate or upgrade to PVS1.
Modification Type:
Gene-specific
Moderate
Transactivation assays demonstrating altered transactivation (<20% of wt and/or reduced to levels similar to well established pathogenic variants such as R201Q or R166Q) OR ≥ 2 secondary assays demonstrating altered function.
Modification Type:
Gene-specific,Strength
Supporting
Transactivation assays demonstrating enhanced transactivation (>115% of wt).
Modification Type:
Gene-specific,Strength
Not Applicable
|
||||
PS4 | ||||
Original ACMG Summary
The prevalence of the variant in affected individuals is significantly increased compared to the prevalence in controls.
Note 1: Relative risk (RR) or odds ratio (OR), as obtained from case-control studies, is >5.0 and the confidence interval around the estimate of RR or OR does not include 1.0. See manuscript for detailed guidance. Note 2: In instances of very rare variants where case-control studies may not reach statistical significance, the prior observation of the variant in multiple unrelated patients with the same phenotype, and its absence in controls, may be used as moderate level of evidence. Stand Alone
Very Strong
Strong
≥ 4 probands meeting at least one of the RUNX1-phenotypic criteria.
Modification Type:
Disease-specific
Moderate
2-3 probands meeting at least one of the RUNX1-phenotypic criteria.
Modification Type:
Disease-specific,Strength
Supporting
1 proband meeting at least one of the RUNX1-phenotypic criteria.
Modification Type:
Disease-specific,Strength
Not Applicable
|
||||
PM1 | ||||
Original ACMG Summary
Located in a mutational hot spot and/or critical and well-established functional domain (e.g. active site of an enzyme) without benign variation.
Stand Alone
Very Strong
Strong
Moderate
Variant affecting one of the following amino acid residues within he RHD: R107, K110, A134, R162, R166, S167, R169, G170, K194, T196, D198, R201, R204.
Modification Type:
Gene-Specific
Supporting
Variant affecting one of the other amino acid residues 89-204 within the RHD.
Modification Type:
Gene-specific,Strength
Not Applicable
|
||||
PM2 | ||||
Original ACMG Summary
Absent from controls (or at extremely low frequency if recessive) in Exome Sequencing Project, 1000 Genomes or Exome Aggregation Consortium.
Caveat: Population data for indels may be poorly called by next generation sequencing. Stand Alone
Very Strong
Strong
Moderate
Supporting
Variant must be completely absent from all population databases.
Modification Type:
Strength
Not Applicable
|
||||
PM3 | ||||
Original ACMG Summary
For recessive disorders, detected in trans with a pathogenic variant
Note: This requires testing of parents (or offspring) to determine phase. Stand Alone
Very Strong
Strong
Moderate
Supporting
Not Applicable
Comments:
FPD/AML is inherited in an autosomal dominant manner, thus PM3 is not applicable.
|
||||
PM4 | ||||
Original ACMG Summary
Protein length changes due to in-frame deletions/insertions in a non-repeat region or stop-loss variants.
Stand Alone
Very Strong
Strong
Moderate
In-frame deletion/insertion impacting at least one of the following amino acid residues within the RHD: R107, K110, A134, R162, R166, S167, R169, G170, K194, T196, D198, R201, R204.
Modification Type:
Gene-specific
Supporting
In-frame deletion/insertion impacting at least one of the other amino acid residues 89-204 within the RHD.
Modification Type:
Gene-specific,Strength
Not Applicable
|
||||
PM5 | ||||
Original ACMG Summary
Novel missense change at an amino acid residue where a different missense change determined to be pathogenic has been seen before.
Example: Arg156His is pathogenic; now you observe Arg156Cys. Caveat: Beware of changes that impact splicing rather than at the amino acid/protein level. Stand Alone
Very Strong
Strong
Missense change at an AA residue where ≥ 2 different missense changes which have been determined to be pathogenic before. Not applicable in combination with PM1.
Modification Type:
Strength
Moderate
Missense change at an amino acid residue where a different missense change which has been determined to be pathogenic before.
Modification Type:
None
Supporting
Missense change at an amino acid residue where a different missense change which has been determined to be likely pathogenic before. PM5_supporting is also applied to nonsense/frameshift variants that are downstream of c.98 (in transcript NM_001754.4).
Modification Type:
Strength
Not Applicable
|
||||
PM6 | ||||
Original ACMG Summary
Assumed de novo, but without confirmation of paternity and maternity.
Stand Alone
Very Strong
Strong
Moderate
Phenotypic specificity category: “Phenotype consistent with gene but not highly specific and high genetic heterogeneity” For each proven de novo case give 0.5 points, for each assumed de novo case give 0.25 point. Moderate = 1.0 points total.
Modification Type:
Disease-specific,Strength
Supporting
Not Applicable
|
||||
PP1 | ||||
Original ACMG Summary
Co-segregation with disease in multiple affected family members in a gene definitively known to cause the disease.
Note: May be used as stronger evidence with increasing segregation data. Stand Alone
Very Strong
Strong
≥ 7 meioses observed within one or across multiple families.
Modification Type:
Disease-specific,Strength
Moderate
Co-segregation with disease in multiple affected family members. 5 or 6 meioses observed within one or across multiple families.
Modification Type:
Disease-specific,Strength
Supporting
3 or 4 meioses observed within one or across multiple families.
Modification Type:
Disease-specific
Not Applicable
|
||||
PP2 | ||||
Original ACMG Summary
Missense variant in a gene that has a low rate of benign missense variation and where missense variants are a common mechanism of disease.
Stand Alone
Very Strong
Strong
Moderate
Supporting
Not Applicable
Comments:
The recommended cutoff for PP2 by the SVI is a missense constraint z score of 3.09 which was not met by RUNX1 (2.48 on ExAC and 2.08 on gnomAD). In addition, there are 9 benign/likely benign missense RUNX1 variants in ClinVar.
|
||||
PP3 | ||||
Original ACMG Summary
Multiple lines of computational evidence support a deleterious effect on the gene or gene product (conservation, evolutionary, splicing impact, etc.).
Caveat: As many in silico algorithms use the same or very similar input for their predictions, each algorithm should not be counted as an independent criterion. PP3 can be used only once in any evaluation of a variant. Stand Alone
Very Strong
Strong
Moderate
Supporting
For missense variants: REVEL score ≥ 0.88. For missense, synonymous and intronic (intron 4-8) variants: SpliceAI ≥ 0.38, including the creation of cryptic novel splice sites.
Modification Type:
Gene-specific,Disease-specific
Not Applicable
|
||||
PP4 | ||||
Original ACMG Summary
Patient’s phenotype or family history is highly specific for a disease with a single genetic etiology.
Stand Alone
Very Strong
Strong
Moderate
Supporting
Not Applicable
Comments:
The FPD/AML phenotype is rather unspecific and can be caused by a number of other inherited predisposition syndromes, somatic mutations or environmental factors that are insufficient to meet the original ACMG/AMP rule PP4.
|
||||
PP5 | ||||
Original ACMG Summary
Reputable source recently reports variant as pathogenic, but the evidence is not available to the laboratory to perform an independent evaluation.
Not Applicable
This criterion is not for use as recommended by the ClinGen Sequence Variant Interpretation VCEP Review Committee.
PubMed : 29543229
|
||||
BA1 | ||||
Original ACMG Summary
Allele frequency is above 5% in Exome Sequencing Project, 1000 Genomes or Exome Aggregation Consortium.
Stand Alone
Minor allele frequency between 0.0015 (0.15%) in any general continental population dataset with ≥ 2,000 alleles tested and variant present in ≥ 5 alleles.
Modification Type:
Disease-specific
Very Strong
Strong
Moderate
Supporting
Not Applicable
|
||||
BS1 | ||||
Original ACMG Summary
Allele frequency is greater than expected for disorder.
Stand Alone
Very Strong
Strong
Minor allele frequency between 0.00015 (0.015%) and 0.0015 (0.15%) in any general continental population dataset with ≥ 2,000 alleles tested and variant present in ≥ 5 alleles.
Modification Type:
Disease-specific
Moderate
Supporting
Not Applicable
|
||||
BS2 | ||||
Original ACMG Summary
Observed in a healthy adult individual for a recessive (homozygous), dominant (heterozygous), or X-linked (hemizygous) disorder, with full penetrance expected at an early age.
Stand Alone
Very Strong
Strong
Moderate
Supporting
Not Applicable
Comments:
BS2 is not applicable since FPD/AML patients display incomplete penetrance and the average age of onset of hematologic malignancies is 33.
|
||||
BS3 | ||||
Original ACMG Summary
Well-established in vitro or in vivo functional studies show no damaging effect on protein function or splicing.
Stand Alone
Very Strong
Strong
Transactivation assays demonstrating normal transactivation (80- 115% of wt) AND data from a secondary assay demonstrating normal function.
Modification Type:
Gene-specific
Moderate
Supporting
Transactivation assays demonstrating normal transactivation (80- 115% of wt).
Modification Type:
Gene-specific,Strength
Not Applicable
|
||||
BS4 | ||||
Original ACMG Summary
Lack of segregation in affected members of a family.
Caveat: The presence of phenocopies for common phenotypes (i.e. cancer, epilepsy) can mimic lack of segregation among affected individuals. Also, families may have more than one pathogenic variant contributing to an autosomal dominant disorder, further confounding an apparent lack of segregation. Stand Alone
Very Strong
Strong
Applied when seen in ≥ 2 informative meioses.
Modification Type:
General recommendation
Moderate
Supporting
Not Applicable
|
||||
BP1 | ||||
Original ACMG Summary
Missense variant in a gene for which primarily truncating variants are known to cause disease.
Stand Alone
Very Strong
Strong
Moderate
Supporting
Not Applicable
Comments:
BP1 is not applicable for RUNX1, because both truncating and missense variants cause FPD/AML.
|
||||
BP2 | ||||
Original ACMG Summary
Observed in trans with a pathogenic variant for a fully penetrant dominant gene/disorder or observed in cis with a pathogenic variant in any inheritance pattern.
Stand Alone
Very Strong
Strong
Moderate
Supporting
Observed in trans with a pathogenic variant for a fully penetrant dominant gene/disorder or observed in cis with a pathogenic variant in any inheritance pattern.
Modification Type:
None
Not Applicable
|
||||
BP3 | ||||
Original ACMG Summary
In frame-deletions/insertions in a repetitive region without a known function.
Stand Alone
Very Strong
Strong
Moderate
Supporting
Not Applicable
Comments:
RUNX1 does not contain a repetitive region without known function. BP3 is therefore deemed not applicable.
|
||||
BP4 | ||||
Original ACMG Summary
Multiple lines of computational evidence suggest no impact on gene or gene product (conservation, evolutionary, splicing impact, etc)
Caveat: As many in silico algorithms use the same or very similar input for their predictions, each algorithm cannot be counted as an independent criterion. BP4 can be used only once in any evaluation of a variant. Stand Alone
Very Strong
Strong
Moderate
Supporting
For missense variants: REVEL score <0.50 AND SpliceAI ≤ 0.20. For synonymous and Intronic variants: SpliceAI ≤ 0.20.
Modification Type:
Gene-specific,Disease-specific
Not Applicable
|
||||
BP5 | ||||
Original ACMG Summary
Variant found in a case with an alternate molecular basis for disease.
Stand Alone
Very Strong
Strong
Moderate
Supporting
Not Applicable
Comments:
BP5 is not applicable. In rare circumstances, a patient can carry two pathogenic variants in genes predisposing to hematologic malignancies.
|
||||
BP6 | ||||
Original ACMG Summary
Reputable source recently reports variant as benign, but the evidence is not available to the laboratory to perform an independent evaluation.
Not Applicable
This criterion is not for use as recommended by the ClinGen Sequence Variant Interpretation VCEP Review Committee.
PubMed : 29543229
|
||||
BP7 | ||||
Original ACMG Summary
A synonymous variant for which splicing prediction algorithms predict no impact to the splice consensus sequence nor the creation of a new splice site AND the nucleotide is not highly conserved.
Stand Alone
Very Strong
Strong
Moderate
Supporting
BP7 is applicable for synonymous and intronic which SpliceAI ≤ 0.20 AND evolutionary conservation prediction algorithms predict the site as not conserved phyloP100 way (GRCh38/hg38) ≤2.0).
Modification Type:
Gene-specific,Disease-specific
Not Applicable
|
One Baylor Plaza, MS:BCM225 Suite 400D, Houston, TX, 77030
Questions or comments?